Is Pfizer Consdering “Directing Evolution”, Mutating COVID to Make Money on Updated Jabs?

2023-01-25 • SEND FEEDBACK |
Related: ethics in medicine, gears of the machine, Medical Industrial Complex, SARS-CoV-2 aka COVID-19 aka Coronavirus

re: ethics in medicine
re: COVID

Life got you down today? Consider the love child of Andrew Tate and Greta Thunberg.

Over on Twitter, Project Veritas is showing us an Atlas Shrugged TV-like moment. As in the book as in: “is this real?!”. One million views in 90 minutes...

Video of Jordan Walker talking about directed evolution... which feels like a hoax video since the guy seems like he’s stoned or drunk or just unbelievably stupid enough to answer the questions. But maybe it’s really real?

The “Don’t be evil” Google scumbags suppressed the story for a good while, but gave up after some hours. Then the dirtbags of humanity at YouTube removed the Project Veritas video, citing some bullshit reason lacking all details.

Is every conspiracy theory going to be proven true? Totally plausible, given many past legal settlements in the drug industry—look it up yourself, it’s an industry of vicious moral criminals. Actually, it is not surprising in the least, what’s surprising is seeing it outed by an apparent idiot (in terms of loose lips).

• Evidence: Project Veritas has just obtained internal @pfizer docs further verifying Jordan Walker as @pfizer Director, Research & Development Strategic Operations
• “"Don't tell anyone this...There is a risk...have to be very controlled to make sure this virus you mutate doesn't create something...the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest.” — Jordan TrishtonWalker @Pfizer
• “why don’t we just mutate it ourselves...” —  Jordan Trishton Walker @Pfizer
• “A revolving door for all government officials... bad for everyone else in America...” — Jordan Trishton Walker @Pfizer
• “Don’t tell anyone...The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys...we successively cause them to keep infecting each other...” - Jordon Trishton Walker, @Pfizer

It’s not clear if Pfizer is already mutating the virus, or is just considering it. Apparently Pfizer is “in the clear” if it is just named  “directed evolution”. The idea being that if you create a nasty variant in the lab and something similar pops up, you then can make a vaccine ASAP. What could go wrong? Other than what went wrong in Wuhan.

This Jordon Trishton Walker guy seems to be a moral pervert, or a total moron, hard to tell which.

“If this is the quality of individuals... it’s profoundly corrupt... Pfizer has completed regulatory capture and is quite proud of it.” — Dr Robert Malone.

See also: Pfizer Pleased To Announce Their New Vaccine 90% Effective Against New Virus They Created and China Develops New More Protective Anal Mask

Pfizer’s response

The word salad from Pfizer is de facto proof that the accusations are in fact true; see Pfizer Responds After Director Says Company Is Developing Ways to Mutate COVID-19.

“In the ongoing development of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer has not conducted gain of function or directed evolution research,” Pfizer said in a lengthy written statement after days of ignoring queries from The Epoch Times and other outlets.

Pfizer did say that it has conducted research “where the original SARS-CoV-2 virus has been used to express the spike protein from new variants of concern.”

“This work is undertaken once a new variant of concern has been identified by public health authorities. This research provides a way for us to rapidly assess the ability of an existing vaccine to induce antibodies that neutralize a newly identified variant of concern. We then make this data available through peer reviewed scientific journals and use it as one of the steps to determine whether a vaccine update is required,” the company added.

WIND: we already know that “gain of function” and “directed evolution” are meaningless terms, used however those using them wish to use them, Alice in Wonderland style. The issues raised are not even addressed in the response.

For individuals, innocent until proven guilty. For organizations of any kind, the presumption of guilt is an absolute requirement until and unless a high level of transparency has been reached. Pfizer therefore is guilty as charged.