As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases @AMAZON
2012 Moots Psychlo X RSL — vs MootoX RSL
Related: Cyclocross, gear, Moots, Moots mountain bikes, mountain biking, Schwalbe

Here I share my thoughts for those riders considering a mountain bike or cyclocross bike, namely the Moots MootoX RSL or the Moots Psychlo X RSL cyclocross bike.
I own the Moots Mooto X RSL hard-tail mountain bike, and it’s my favorite mountain bike— ever. It’s incredibly responsive and fast, handles great, is reasonably comfortable and I can ride it for hours.
I also own the Moots Psychlo X RSL cyclocross bike. It is wonderful for its ability to traverse back and forth between road and dirt— definitely more rewarding on the road than the Mooto X RSL mountain bike, and definitely less comfortable descending rough stuff on the trails, and with less grip.
Hardtail MTB vs cyclocross
A mountain bike is definitely not a cyclocross bike, there are key differences, I’ll list just a few here as I see as relevant between the two Mootses:
- Mooto X RSL is 4 pounds heavier (21.7) than the Psychlo X RSL (17.7), mostly due to the suspension fork.
- Mooto X RSL can go faster and safer and more fun on steep downhills.
- Mooto X RSL with locked-out suspension fork and 40 psi in Schwalbe Furious Fred tires goes nearly as fast and efficient as the Psychlo X RSL off-road, based on my own times on a fixed course. Mooto X RSL is reasonably fast on-road also (with fast rolling S.F.F. tires and 35-40 psi). But not as fun on road.
- Tire sizes are more flexible on the Mooto X RSL, but the Schwalbe Furious Fred tires are a very similar weight to cyclocross tires. MTB can also take skinny tires or fatter tires or more aggressive tires and the disk brakes make carbon fiber wheels plenty light.
- MTB gearing is much lower, so one runs out of gears with a 38 X 26 crankset on MTB, but a 50 X 34 or 46 X 39 on a cyclocross bike provides much higher speeds, a big deal on some road rides with steady downhill sections.
- The Moots Psychlo X RSL cyclocross bike is more efficient and more fun on the road. It can be pressed into duty for a double century (for example), using lightweight road tires. Or one can run 33/34mm knobby tires for highly credible offroad use.
More
If one must choose (we’re talking $8K - $10K for either bike built up nicely), the decision must take into account the riding planned.
In my view, one can ride the Moots MootoX RSL very much like a cross bike— I believe I do, based on riding both. So arguments for cross-training with road-cycling are legitimate with the Moots MootoX RSL. You see, I ride the MootoX RSL very much like the Pyschlo X RSL already— I rely heavily on balance and finesse, I stand a great deal, I feather the brakes, I finesse-ride, I find the best line as a challenge and game— stuff I enjoyed over many weeks of riding in Moab, Utah over the years.
And yet, what a cyclocross bike does REALLY WELL is traverse road/off-road/road/off-road seamlessly, which can be great fun, and expand the riding envelope to avert boredom (or muddy trails).
What a mountain bike does really well is soak up the rough stuff. If primary riding is on the trail, a hard-tail mountain bike applied occassionally to road use is just the ticket— swap out the tires from light and fast MTB tires.
Apple 16.2" MacBook Pro with M1 Max Chip (Late 2021, Space Gray)
SAVE $1100