Thank you for purchasing through links and ads on this site.
OWC / MacSales.com...
diglloyd Deal Finder...
Buy other stuff at Amazon.com...
Capacities up to 56TB and speeds up to 1527MB/s
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$3198 $1798
SAVE $1400

$2799 $2099
SAVE $700

$199 $129
SAVE $70

$1599 $1599
SAVE $0

$140 $100
SAVE $40

$699 $549
SAVE $150

$4499 $2649
SAVE $1850

$1699 $1199
SAVE $500

$5999 $5499
SAVE $500

$181 $141
SAVE $40

$7699 $7199
SAVE $500

$4499 $2649
SAVE $1850

$400 $330
SAVE $70

$4499 $2649
SAVE $1850

$4999 $4599
SAVE $400

$2350 $1950
SAVE $400

$1699 $1299
SAVE $400

$799 $699
SAVE $100

$200 $160
SAVE $40

$1997 $897
SAVE $1100

$250 $110
SAVE $140

$1398 $898
SAVE $500

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

$3999 $2499
SAVE $1500

$200 $170
SAVE $30

$3999 $2499
SAVE $1500

$1498 $1398
SAVE $100

$2497 $1897
SAVE $600

$748 $598
SAVE $150

$899 $699
SAVE $200

SRM Power Meter Accuracy

Last updated 2011-05-16 - Send Feedback
Related: bicycle power meter, Road Bikes, SRM, training

SRM claims accuracy to within 2%.

Computing watts

Nominal power output can be computed with the following simplified formula, which does not take air resistance or drive-train losses or other power losses into account.

Watts = 9.8 * WeightInKg * AscentInMeters / seconds
or
Watts = 1.3549 * WeightInPounds * AscentInFeet / seconds

Naturally weight must be the total riding weight: rider + clothing, water, bike, etc.

Testing the accuracy

Consider the following efforts up my favorite Old La Honda climb. Ascents 1 and 2 were back to back on the same day, ascent 3 was the next day.

Total riding weight is approximate to within 1-2%. Nominal watts is computed as per the formula above. The SRM reading is about 16% higher than nominal computed watts, which seems reasonable when accounting for frictional and other forces.

Ascent Time mm:ss Seconds SRM watts Nominal watts Delta
1 23:39 1419 287.7 247.8 +16.1%
2 22:40 1360 299.1 258.6 +15.7%
3 24:54 1494 267.1 237.7 +12.4%

Analysis: assuming the SRM power figure for Ascent 1 is accurate, Ascent 2 shows a reading that is 3.96% higher wattage, so we can expect a reduction to a time of 1365 seconds, which is within 5 seconds of the actual measured time, or within 0.3%.

On the next day, the power reading from Ascent 2 predicts a time of 1479 seconds versus a clocked time of 1494 seconds, or about a 1% difference. Being within 1% is still quite accurate, and this could be accounted for by inaccuracy in the total riding weight figure (I don’t have a scale available at the bottom of the hill).

Upgrade Your Mac Memory
At much lower cost than Apple, with more options.
Lloyd recommends 64GB for iMac or Mac Pro for photography/videography.

Testing accuracy on a more gentle climb

This example is a 470-foot ascent taking just under 13 minutes in 2.04 miles.

Show below are two groups of ascents less than 24 hours apart. Deviation is calculated as the percent difference of the seconds/watts ratio versus the average seconds/average watts ratio.

As can be seen, the variation is at most 1.4%, well within the SRM claimed accuracy of 2%, and of course a bit of wind and fluid loss cannot be ruled out as at least minor factors.


See also Canon wishlist
View all handpicked deals...

Apple 15.4" MacBook Pro with Touch Bar (Mid 2019, Space Gray)
$2799 $2099
SAVE $700

diglloyd.com | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
Mailing Lists | RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.
Display info: __RETINA_INFO_STATUS__