Thank you for buying via links and ads on this site,
which earn me advertising fees or commissions.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Other World Computing...
B&H Photo...
Amazon
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Capacities up to 56TB and speeds up to 1527MB/s
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$1100 $880
SAVE $220

$999 $779
SAVE $220

$1299 $949
SAVE $350

$799 $549
SAVE $250

$1499 $999
SAVE $500

$799 $549
SAVE $250

$2797 $2497
SAVE $300

$1997 $1797
SAVE $200

$549 $499
SAVE $50

$1699 $949
SAVE $750

$240 $175
SAVE $65

$3399 $2699
SAVE $700

Faster Ascents By Reducing TOTAL Riding Weight (TRW)

2011-03-30 updated 2011-05-23 - Send Feedback
Related: training

For extreme climbing as in the Everest Challenge, every extra pound of weight translates directly into increased ascending time. Any means of reducing total riding weight can make a large difference.

Steep climb savings

On a steep climb, most energy goes into higher kinetic potential: the energy you expend moves you and your bike up the hill. Friction from wind, tires and mechanical drag is at a minimum; it’s mostly about the grade

  • How fast one one ascends a steep grade is almost a pure power-to-weight issue.
  • How fast one goes on flats is a pure power issue (given any particular setup), with nearly all the energy going into drag (air resistance).

Body weight and relative gain

Assume a total weight (rider+bike+gear) of 160 pounds, versus 200 pounds.

For a 160 pound cyclist+bike+gear, a savings of 2 pounds is a 25% more effective gain than for a 200 pounder, because the ascent savings is proportionally more for the lighter rider.

Saving weight in the wheels is best of all, because it’s rotating weight.

Non-obvious benefits of reduced weight (fat)

One can argue that reductions in weight do not result in linear reductions in ascent time, since there are friction and mechanical losses. This is certainly true, but on steep climbs the speeds are low, and the air friction does not increase substantially.

There are key benefits that the math nerds computing friction coefficients just skip over:

  • Reduced weight is a psychological boon because ascending just feels easier— if you feel fast, you will ride faster; it’s self reinforcing.
  • Reduced weight means increased comfort for the entire body.
  • Reduced weight means less friction on the tires (probably negligible effect unless under-inflated).
  • Reduced weight means a higher cadence, which reduces premature muscle fatigue on steep grinding climbs.
  • Reduced weight increases the amount of time that the rider can stay aerobic as the climb steepens (less power needed for any given speed), thus preserving precious glycogen, and perhaps reducing fluid loss; there is a wider band of exertion which is possible.
  • Perhaps most important on hot days, reduced weight means less insulating body fat, so that heat can escape the body core more easily. Increased body core temperature results in a pronounced reduction in performance.

These benefits might well mean that the gains from reducing weight could actually be greater than computed here, at least when the reduction is more significant.

Read more on the next page

Click the chart to keep reading.

Computed weight vs ascent time

World of Tamron
View all handpicked deals...

Apple 13.3" MacBook Air with Retina Display (Early 2020, Gold)
$999 $779
SAVE $220

diglloyd.com | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
Mailing Lists | RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.
Display info: __RETINA_INFO_STATUS__