All Posts by Date or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
also by Lloyd: and

Thank you for buying via links and ads on this site,
which earn me advertising fees or commissions.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Other World Computing...
B&H Photo...
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Upgrade the memory of your 2020 iMac up to 128GB
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$155 $100
SAVE $55

$2198 $1998
SAVE $200

$1799 $1599
SAVE $200

$999 $779
SAVE $220

$2397 $1897
SAVE $500

$1299 $949
SAVE $350

$799 $549
SAVE $250

$1499 $999
SAVE $500

$799 $549
SAVE $250

$2797 $2497
SAVE $300

$1997 $1797
SAVE $200

$549 $499
SAVE $50

$1699 $949
SAVE $750

$240 $175
SAVE $65

$3399 $2699
SAVE $700

$1100 $880
SAVE $220

SARS-CoV-2 aka COVID-19: a Note to Experts: this Video Shows Why Facial Coverings are Useless (not)

See also:

Why the fuck are facial coverings not MANDATORY in all public places?

Maybe this video will help the WHO and CDC and Surgeon General understand something that any idiot can figure out. I myself am such an idiot—I know so because a few readers told me so! :) I was that dumb even back on January 29.

From Researchers modelling the spread of the coronavirus emphasise the importance of avoiding busy indoor spaces.

Why have experts been so wrong about just about everything with SARS-CoV2?

Because our experts have more of a hyper needing to be right than to discern reality? Because those experts think assumptions are science and do not understand even the most basic science: you make a hypothesis and try repeatedly to disprove it. Or because showing the 'wrong' results can ruin your career or deprive you of funding or block advancement or get you demoted, or at least result in ridicule*?

And when a scientist lacks imagination (because of assumptions and incestuous amplification within intellectually-inbred communities of researchers), you need to see half a dozen other studies by non intellectually-incestuous researchers with no vested status or financial interests to replicate the results. Which said-replication cannot be done about half the time even for studies in peer-reviewed journals. The combination of rejecting assumptions, creative thinking, freedom from financial or status incentives are rare in science today. Witness the clusterfuck that is the poisoning of the world for net-zero benefit (at best) of statins.

* If experts cannot predict a few weeks ahead, what that says for climate science, which is heavily dependent on models and predicts for decades? Offensive? Then you don’t believe in real science.

Zeiss Batis for Sony
View all handpicked deals...

Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM Lens
$2198 $1998
SAVE $200 | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
Mailing Lists | RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.
Display info: __RETINA_INFO_STATUS__