All Posts by Date or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
also by Lloyd: MacPerformanceGuide.com and WindInMyFace.com

Thank you for buying via links and ads on this site,
which earn me advertising fees or commissions.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Other World Computing...
B&H Photo...
Amazon
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Upgrade the memory of your 2018 Mac mini up to 64GB
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$1398 $998
SAVE $400

$1798 $1198
SAVE $600

$151 $151
SAVE $click

$2299 $2069
SAVE $230

$240 $175
SAVE $65

$240 $175
SAVE $65

$1399 $1399
SAVE $click

$2198 $1998
SAVE $200

$2299 $1799
SAVE $500

$2000 $1500
SAVE $500

$898 $798
SAVE $100

$1799 $1699
SAVE $100

$1699 $1499
SAVE $200

$999 $799
SAVE $200

$1798 $1198
SAVE $600

$1997 $1797
SAVE $200

$3199 $3199
SAVE $click

$80 $33
SAVE $46

$199 $149
SAVE $50

$699 $549
SAVE $150

$400 $300
SAVE $100

$2090 $1690
SAVE $400

$1699 $949
SAVE $750

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

$1199 $1099
SAVE $100

$999 $949
SAVE $50

$1699 $949
SAVE $750

SARS-CoV-2 aka COVID-19: a Note to Experts: this Video Shows Why Facial Coverings are Useless (not)

See also:

Why the fuck are facial coverings not MANDATORY in all public places?

Maybe this video will help the WHO and CDC and Surgeon General understand something that any idiot can figure out. I myself am such an idiot—I know so because a few readers told me so! :) I was that dumb even back on January 29.

From Researchers modelling the spread of the coronavirus emphasise the importance of avoiding busy indoor spaces.

Why have experts been so wrong about just about everything with SARS-CoV2?

Because our experts have more of a hyper needing to be right than to discern reality? Because those experts think assumptions are science and do not understand even the most basic science: you make a hypothesis and try repeatedly to disprove it. Or because showing the 'wrong' results can ruin your career or deprive you of funding or block advancement or get you demoted, or at least result in ridicule*?

And when a scientist lacks imagination (because of assumptions and incestuous amplification within intellectually-inbred communities of researchers), you need to see half a dozen other studies by non intellectually-incestuous researchers with no vested status or financial interests to replicate the results. Which said-replication cannot be done about half the time even for studies in peer-reviewed journals. The combination of rejecting assumptions, creative thinking, freedom from financial or status incentives are rare in science today. Witness the clusterfuck that is the poisoning of the world for net-zero benefit (at best) of statins.

* If experts cannot predict a few weeks ahead, what that says for climate science, which is heavily dependent on models and predicts for decades? Offensive? Then you don’t believe in real science.

OWC Envoy Pro Elektron

Ultra-high performance across entire capacity, outperforms the competition.

Tiny, bus-powered, rugged, compact!


√ No more slow and noisy hard drives!
Thunderbolt 4 Dock

Thunderbolt 4 hub and ports!

Any Mac with Thunderbolt 3.


View all handpicked deals...

Sony Alpha a7R II Mirrorless Digital Camera (Body Only)
$1798 $1198
SAVE $600

diglloyd.com | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
Mailing Lists | RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.
Display info: __RETINA_INFO_STATUS__