Did we Really Have the Pandemic it was claimed to be? Are we really seeing cases spike? CDC Now Disavows PCR tests so long used to diagnose infections

2021-07-25 • SEND FEEDBACK |
Related: gear, gears of the machine, influenza, risk assessment, SARS-CoV-2 aka COVID-19 aka Coronavirus

re: COVID-19: Is the PCR test used by Germany and the USA a Medical Fraud?
re: COVID-19: WHO Changes Guidance to Address False Positives PCR Tests with Absurdly High Ct Cutoff Value, and no Baseline Rate Metric
re: COVID-19: is the Cycle Cutoff Value (Ct value) for PCR Tests Way Too High? Thus False Positives Used to Justify Tyranny and Destroy Lives

Last year, I wrote about the absurdly inaccurate PCR test used to call something a “case”. Now the CDC belatedly admits that it was de facto of dubious validity.

Maybe it was a medical fraud all along?

If the PCR tests were/are scientifically valid, why now abandon them? And with an alert no less, abruptly terminating PCR tests. Doctors out there, am I missing something here?

CDC 07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing

Audience: Individuals Performing COVID-19 Testing
Level: Laboratory Alert

After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.

Visit the FDA website for a list of authorized COVID-19 diagnostic methods. For a summary of the performance of FDA-authorized molecular methods with an FDA reference panel, visit this page.

In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season. Laboratories and testing sites should validate and verify their selected assay within their facility before beginning clinical testing.

...

WIND: translation: the PCR tests were probably bullshit. The statement also suggests that it distinguishing influenza from COVID was never viable, but we should not try to get it right for a change.

Did we have a pandemic or not? Maybe, but we’ll never know what really happened in terms of COVID infections.