AHA Circulation: mRNA COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning (looks liike false/unsubstantiated BS)
Real science is never settled, and anyone who has certainty on such things is not qualified to discuss it.
It is my view that many if not most modern diseases (heart disease, diabetes, and many others) stem in one way or another from inflammatory processes. I am pretty sure that many doctors would agree with that view.
Below, it doesn’t get much more compelling than in ruling out confounders by comparing biomarkers within a group over 8 years. I would like to know if other studies of this kind have been done, and if this paper has any technical flaws—cardiologists? Or maybe the study is bullshit and I can’t tell (all I have is the summary). I do hope it’s debunked somehow, because the finding are terrifying.
UPDATE: most scientific studies are bullshit. And I apply that to anything; I’m not after any particular narrative, only the truth. Anonymous MD writes:
This was only an abstract submitted for the National AHA meeting in November. There are no data provided other than was is in this 250 word abstract. As the attached concern points out, there are no statistical analysis performed and numerous typographical errors. Moreover, I don’t know that this package of diagnostic tests has ever been validated. It is also concerning that this test has been "measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years.” The test costs $350!. You might find this interesting as well:: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Gundry I doubt this abstract would stand up to any scrutiny, even by an honest cardiologist like me.
My comments rested on an incorrect premise an apparently invalid claims. Like all reasoning chains, they fall if the premise falls. So I stand by them as comments relative to a true claim, but otherwise retract them because too much doubt exists.
mRNA COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)...
...At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac. We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelial and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
WIND: and potentially myriad other problems outside cardiology. Administration of mRNA COVID vaccines causes “dramatic” increases in inflammation biomarkers that “persist for at least 2.5 months post-second-dose”? OMG.
Maybe those athletes are dropping like flies for a reason? Nah... coincidence.
To be fair, the same biomarkers should be examined in patients that get COVID, and compared over time. And maybe there is a flaw like that in the above study? It is possible that the vaccines cause harm, and that COVID itself causes more harm. After all, it took me 18 months to get past my Long-Haul COVID problems and maybe that was at least in part an inflammation effects in many areas of my body. But why don’t we study such before committing to a risky experiment for the entire population? It’s one thing to vaccinate high risk people, and quite another to impose risks on healthy people, and an abomination to forcibly vaccinate a million children to maybe prevent one death of one sickly child. Proselytizing evil as a society.
If the inflammation persists over time, then hundreds of millions of people might have been damaged in a very significant way. Even if there is only a 1% effect in generating significant issues, that would be a public health disaster unprecedented in history.
Meanwhile, the COVID vaccines not only suck at preventing COVID, but wear off so rapidly that any risk assessment done objectively would have to conclude that the risks outweigh the benefits for any healthy and relatively young person. The “experts” driving this train wreck are caricatures of responsibility, jackasses in terms of medical ethics.
But the good news is that all over the world , vaccination has stopped COVID in its tracks. Hallelujah! Only that’s the opposite of what has happened, and it sure looks like we are now in a pandemic of the vaccinated, which is invisible to all of our experts and leader, from cognitive dissonance. So double-down on what has clearly been total failure (masks, lockdowns), double-down on what is clearly not stopping anything (vaccinations), because two times zero is twenty.
Now go get your booster, because it is safe and effective.
Real data now supports speculations
This study above is consistent with claims in other papers that damage from vaccines will persist and with cumulative and irreversible effects.
...the clinical trials did not address changes in biomarkers that could serve as early warning indicators of elevated predisposition to serious diseases. Most importantly, the clinical trials did not address long-term effects that, if serious, would be borne by children/adolescents for potentially decades...
The first inoculant dose can be viewed as priming the immune system. The immune response will be relatively modest. The second inoculant dose can be expected to elicit a more vigorous immune response. This will enhance the desired antibody production in the muscle cells and lymphatic system, but may also enhance the immune response to both the blood vessel-lining endothelial cells displaying the spike protein and the platelets, causing more severe damage. If a booster (s) inoculation is also required, this may further enhance both the positive and negative immune responses resulting from the second inoculation. While the positive effects are reversible (antibody levels decrease with time), adverse effects may be cumulative and irreversible, and therefore injury and death rates may increase with every additional inoculation.
Unknown future harms
I wonder what the Pfizer vaccine means for my wife, who could be pushed over the edge in one her health conditions, by increased inflammation.
How many people will die or have diseases provoked by inflammation that otherwise would not have? If this were a drug or a supplement effect, that drug or supplement would surely be banned from the market. But now that Big Pharma has unblinded the control groups, plausible deniability exists as a bludgeon to gaslight any findings that show harm.
What is going to happen to an entire generation of children forcibly vaccinated, let alone 200 million adults? No expert on earth can rule out the possibility that the COVID vaccines will ultimately kill far more people (and younger ones!), than ever die from COVID? As one FDA commissioner said, we have to give the vaccines to find out what happens!