Real science is never settled, and anyone who has certainty on such things is not qualified to discuss it.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.” — Alice in Wonderland.
2021-12-08, by Zachary Steiber
The definition of fully vaccinated in the United States will be changed, Dr. Anthony Fauci said Wednesday. “It’s going to be a matter of when, not if,” Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said during an appearance on CNN.
[WIND: lots of good “factual” news on CNN, no wonder Fauci likes appearing there]
The term fully vaccinated presently refers to a person who receives two doses of the Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines or the single-shot Johnson & Johnson jab.
Fauci previously said the definition could be changed. Dr. Rochelle Walensky, head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)—which set the definition—has left open the possibility of changing it.
The definition is used by authorities imposing vaccine mandates across the country, including the federal mandates against healthcare workers and government contractors.
There’s been “a slow but steady waning of immunity over time,” Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, said last month.
[WIND: outright lies of three kinds: immunity is NOT ACHIEVED, and what protective effect is acquired wanes in only a few months, all while doing unknown damage to the body]
WIND: so animal-abuser Fauci and hot-mess Walensky will let you know if you are fully vaccinated, just as soon as it pleases them. They’re prepping you for the change, which is an excellent psy-ops precursor. Check your dictionary daily!
OK, so the facts have changed, so we need to redefine things to update things. Oh, wait, the facts haven’t really changed, just our understanding of them—because so little effort was made to test things properly to start with. And we need 75 years to release the information about how this was approved. Getting the picture? Say anything and do anything, it’s all just fine to conduct this mass experiment without any defensible scientific basis—no one is allowed to know just how careful or lax this all is. OK, maybe it’s not that bad, we can figure it out from the collateral damage over the next few years.
And now “anti-vaxxer” has been redefined by Meriam Webster to including anyone opposing mandated vaccination, so as to conflate those who oppose vaccination with those who oppose the use of force to impose it. Totally different things. All part of the trend to demonize anyone with an opposing viewpoint, and to lend support to the evil turds who want to rule by edict and force.
Follow the money—the vaccines are a profit gravy train for Big Pharma. Excepting a small at-risk population (free to protect themselves but for whom vaccines are marginal), vaccines are now a huge farce in the context of a heavily vaccinated population which also has a high degree of natural immunity. We don’t have a pandemic any more, unless it be a pandemic of COVID terrorism.
If you think this is not about profit for Big Pharma, ask yourself why the J&J vaccine is even considered vaccination at all, and even allowed? Its benefits are shown to be far inferior to the other two. But it might be the way to go, so as to avoid the mRNA technology.