COVID and Science: Silencing Voices is the Path to Disaster
re: ethics in medicine
Dr Robert Malone, one of the inventors of the mRNA vaccines, has been banned from Twitter, his voice now effectively silenced for a large part of the population.
Except that Joe Rogan’s interview of Dr Robert Malone has garnered a huge audience that is cracking the very foundations of The Narrative and The Science.
Both events are disasters, in that the public desparately needs an honest and open debate, neither a one-sided viewpoint nor the cancellation of an expert viewpoint. We need real science—a debate among opposing viewpoints—not the anti-science we’ve been force-fed for two years.
What is desparately needed is an honest and open debate between voices like Dr Malone, and others of his caliber. But instead he is silenced on Twitter, Twitter thus doing massive and perhaps lasting damage to the entire population of the country and world. Because on Twitter, at least other experts could debate Dr Malone—now impossible.
Still, I’ll take the one-sided viewpoint (Rogan’s interview of Dr Malone) as far preferable over silencing a voice entirely. Now if only Rogan could bring us another viewpoint to debate Dr Malone.