SEARCH
Brownstone Institute: The CDC’s Study on Natural Immunity Explained
Related: ethics in medicine, gear, gears of the machine, GIGO, natural immunity, SARS-CoV-2 aka COVID-19 aka Coronavirus, The Brownstone Institute, vaccination
re: COVID
re: ethics in medicine
re: Brownstone Institute
Why would you get a vaccination if you already had natural immunity? Only because of force/coercion or very special circumstances.
We have witnessed and continue to see the vicious destruction of lives and careers by human scum intent on vilifying those with natural immunity as “unvaccinated”. The anti-science pieces of shit running this country are still at it, with LA county about to fire 18000 workers for being “unvaccinated”.
And choosing to not get vaccinated should be an inviolable right for everyone, regardless of immunity statyus.
Brownstone Institute: The CDC’s Study on Natural Immunity Explained
2022-02-08. Emphasis added.
The Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) published by the Centers for Disease Control has released a fascinating study on comparing hospitalization with Covid-19 immunity status, thus addressing a topic of pressing concern for public health. The study, published in the January 28, 2022 weekly, carries the self-explanatory title “COVID-19 Cases and Hospitalizations by COVID-19 Vaccination Status and Previous COVID-19 Diagnosis — California and New York, May–November 2021.”
The key contribution is the following chart, which illustrates the effectiveness of the vaccine (for the duration of the study) and plots that against the effectiveness of natural immunity with and without the vaccine. What it reveals is a point that has been strangely disputed or at least too often left unacknowledged: the power of natural immunity to serve as protection against severe outcomes from reinfection. This reality bears strongly on the question of vaccine mandates.
Brownstone has kept a running list of studies that confirm the same: that list is now up to 150 studies.
Here is the chart. Below, you can watch a video by Vinay Prasad who explains it in some detail.
WIND: the narrative-focused CDC should have done this a year ago. Will anyone now follow this science?
