A group of respected academics dares speak out against the propaganda narrative that the vaccines are good for us.
23 Jun 2022, by , Joseph Fraiman Louisiana State University - Lallie Kemp Regional Medical Center, Juan Erviti Navarre Health Service, Mark Jones Bond University - Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Sander Greenland University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, Patrick Whelan University of California at Los Angeles, Robert M. Kaplan Stanford University, Peter Doshi University of Maryland - School of Pharmacy
Results: Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of special interest, with an absolute risk increase of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95% CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively. Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an absolute risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 (95% CI 2.1 to 22.9). The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 participants, respectively).
Discussion: The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes such as hospitalization or death.
WIND: in simple terms, this means that it looks like the mRNA vaccines hurt more people than they helped. Maybe a LOT more. It always was an irresponsible thuggish mass experiment and one that used brute force to coerce people into it. Pure evil.
Anyone discusing COVID vaccines failing to put risk assessment foremost has a hidden agenda that is as anti-scientific as it gets.
Will this paper get traction? Too many powerful interests would prefer it not. Therefore, you can expect every variety of hit piece and underhanded effort to undermine the findings, but few if any legitimate scientific objections.