Safe and effective? Effective is out the window within months, safety was never there. The myocarditis concerns are surely the tip of the toxiberg.
Could it be that the 23-sigma* decrease in birth rates and the 6-sigma* increase in deaths in adults of working age in the USA has a causal relationship to the COVID jabs? No other explanation that I’ve heard fits.
* “Impossible” statistics never seen in modern history anywhere in the world, yet it is happening.
Below, unlike the COVID jabs, an actual control group. What a novel concept...
The risk of myocarditis after mRNA vaccination was 8 times and 30 times greater than unvaccinated control groups for BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna), respectively.
The largest association for myocarditis following the Moderna jab was 44 times higher risk for persons aged 18 to 24 years.
As for the Pfizer shot, in relation to the same age group, the risk was 13 times higher.
Infection with the Chinese Communist Party virus yielded, by comparison, a 9 times greater risk of the same condition.
Sudden Adult Death Syndrome
Recently, a new term has been highlighted in media outlets: “sudden adult death syndrome,” or SADS...
WIND: with young adults at nil risk for COVID (even less for children, as in less than zero as in beneficial to train the immune system), the medical system has devolved into a vicious busines of damaging a million people to help a handful for a very short time, all for $100B in profit.
Poorly-tested medical interventions are now the rule. Ethics in medicine are a dumpster fire with many doctors signing up for whatever the latest medical experiment happens to be, without objection. Like jabbing babies and children for COVID. These doctors should lose their medical licenses. A big FU to any doctor who rationalizes such child abuse, rare special cases excepted perhaps.
Anon MD (medical doctor) writes:
It is indeed a mess. Any findings contrary to the worship of the vaccine idol is squashed both by the media and peer review. Both are heavily biased.
So the pro-vaccine data are hard to believe because they fit the narrative and are therefore favorably and uncritically reviewed. By contrast. the studies regarding adverse effects as you have presented, are released as pre-prints and will seldom survive peer review because of the bias of the reviewers. You'll never see these articles published in the NEJM or JAMA, both of which are the medical equivalents of the main stream media. The critical hard data for determining the true risk/benefit does not exist because Pfizer eliminated the control groups by inoculating them as you have repeatedly pointed out.
Whereas long-term safety data for vaccination in the highest risk population early on in the trials may not have been as critical (relatively short life expectancy and beyond their years of contribution to the gene pool), approval of vaccines for low/no risk individuals is unconscionable!
You are indeed correct to follow the money with Big Pharma sitting at the bottom of the trough.
WIND: peer review being a farce foisted on a gullible public and a goodly number of gullible doctors. Indeed, peer review is the new Scientism, though perhaps that has been decades in the making, given the corruption by money of all of science.
The ideas you won’t see in the “news”
It doesn’t matter how many of the claims below are true or weak. There are so many warning signs and so much evidence accumulating that you have to have serious cognitive dissonanceand superhero-grade rationalization powers to keep ignoring it.
Articles like this might be old news to you, since they are like totally all over CNN and FOX and that pillar of credibility, MSNBC/CIA. These paragons of journalistic excellence can be counted on to keep you up to date on exactly what you should know. And how the 'thing' is the opposite of the thing.
Follow the money
Doesn’t everyone like a payday? On the general follow the money front:
Damaging health for money
On the accelerating child abuse front, the propaganda drumbeat is in fine fettle:
My wife gave birth to 3 beautiful girls, and late in life. What a woman!