When Will you be getting Jabbed or Boosted?
This latest COVID “vaccine” rollout is the most unethical medical malpractice seen in anyone’s lifetime. The medical profession has fallen so low I don’t know how it can ever be respected again except by children and idiots.
Not tested on humans, the bivalent boosters surely have a net harm to a very large if not a majority of the population. And the advisory committee blind to the contents. Really?
This is what passes for science these days. Science is a scam. Follow the money.
COVID is now just one of many pathogens. When will the insanity end? Don’t be a sucker—thinking past the sale is what they want you to do. First ask whether it makes sense for you personally. Including that fact that if you have natural immunity (surely 95% of the population now does), that is far superior.
...On Wednesday, August 31, the FDA issued emergency use authorizations for new Pfizer and Moderna mRNA booster vaccines for COVID. The next day, September 1, the CDC’s advisory committee and CDC Director approved the immediate rollout of the new vaccines. They will be administered in the US starting this week.
...The total amount of mRNA for tpohe Pfizer and Moderna booster vaccines is the same as before: 30 mcg for Pfizer and 50 mcg for Moderna. Each is composed of 50% omicron mRNA and 50% ancestral mRNA, and they are termed bivalent vaccines.
...Even the members of the CDC’s advisory committee did not know the dosage of the new bivalent vaccines until their September 1 meeting.
...ny bending the rules, creating a new regulatory playbook and failing to obtain any human data for the new vaccines. The manufacturers did not have to go through months-long trials, and FDA did not have to pour over any human trial data, because there weren’t any. Let that sink in: the new BA.4/5 bivalent vaccines have only been tested in mice, not humans.
How are the mainstream media telling this story? With their usual spin, avoiding the sticky parts. Instead of helping you understand what just happened, the New York Times asks, “When should you get yours?” Not should you get it, just when should you get it. The Herald Tribune tells you why you should get it.
...VRBPAC member Dr. Paul Offit, a professor of pediatric infectious diseases at the University of Pennsylvania and coinventor of a Rotavirus vaccine said last month that “the fix was in,” implying that the committee’s deliberations were a sham, because the White House announced it was purchasing the vaccine right after the meeting ended.
...there are no quality standards ... no quality requirements at all... FDA is not even required to inspect the factories where EUA products are manufactured, as it must do for licensed products. Nor is it required to inspect the final product...
How Long Will It Work?
According to this week’s NEJM article,
“increased neutralizing antibody titers, as well as clinical effectiveness, have been shown to wane by four months after a third messenger RNA immunization. After a fourth messenger RNA immunization, protection against infection with SARS-CoV-2 omicron has been reported to wane after just 4 weeks, although protection against severe disease lasts longer.
Hybrid immunity from both vaccination and infection provides greater and more durable protection than either alone.”
Four weeks! Antibody titers sink 4 weeks after the 4th dose. No wonder CDC is allowing, and may encourage, such frequent boosters.
How Well It Might Work
Predictions from Nature magazine and Dr. Fauci’s NIAID Vaccine Research Center (VRC) at the NIH are that the new vaccines will not improve on the old vaccines.
...The reason why the omicron vaccines won’t stimulate a good omicron response is attributed by the NIAID VRC authors to antigenic priming, also known as original antigenic sin...
...How well did the old vaccine work? The CDC slide below, presented by CDC’s Dr. Link-Gelles, is not well labeled, but it shows that whether you got two or three doses of the old vaccine, during the omicron period efficacy in all age groups was under 40% at three months. By six months it hovered around zero efficacy (no benefit), and after that it was negative (harmful) for most ages.
Negative efficacy means that the vaccinated are more prone to being infected with COVID than the unvaccinated. This is consistent with what we are seeing from the UK and some other countries: the vaccinated become more likely to get COVID. And it is this effect that the public health agencies are probably trying to stave off, or hide, with perpetual boosters.
Reactogenicity is a word that refers to short term vaccine adverse reactions, like fever, redness, fatigue or muscle aches... greater reactogenicity (more acute side effects) seen after the omicron prototype vaccines than seen after the older vaccines. This may be a signal that more severe reactions will result from the newer vaccines, but there is no way to be sure.
...Getting vaccinated soon after recovering from COVID is foolhardy, and any officials mandating the shots after recovery are putting those in their charge at even greater risk of adverse reactions, including myocarditis.
...Some scientists, including Dr. Barouch in last week’s NEJM, assert that myocarditis is “far more frequent” after a case of COVID than it is after vaccination. But he cited not a single source for this claim.
...An ACIP member asked whether the Jynneos monkeypox vaccine, which can also induce myocarditis, could be given together with the new bivalent vaccines? ...not to be discussed in public.
...any discussion of pregnancy and COVID vaccination was forbidden at the ACIP meeting...only conclusion I can draw is that the CDC doesn’t like the results they have now....
...The only conclusion I can draw is that FDA and CDC don’t like the safety results they already have. And they plan to withhold the bad news for as long as possible.
WIND: there is much more; read the whole thing.
News flash: humans are not mice and mice are not humans. “We cannot even rely on nonhuman primates as a model for vaccines, as every species reacts uniquely and unpredictably to infections and to vaccinations”.
Are the new bivalent Jabs worthless? Perhaps not. For those at high risk, it’s a different guessing game than others. But note well it’s a guessing game—anyone who claims that a risk assessment can be done lacking critical data is either a fool or a crook, the lattter far more likely.
The public is being tricked into thinking past the sale: instead of asking “is it a appropriate for ME to get it”, the question is presented as “when should you get it”. That’s a persuasion trick used by propagandists and used-car salesman and politicians. It is medical malpractice, it is a lack of informed consent, it violates all ethical principles in medicine, it is outrageous.
And no one knows if these latest Jabs will do anything for COVID at all, since no one knows what COVID will look like even 4 months from now... about when the Jabs are likely to revert to nil efficacy for those who get it, as with the first round.
The follow the money gravy train is running on schedule. Big Pharma executives must be snickering at the fools and lackeys running this country.
Anon MD writes:
The EPOCH times article referred to Paul Offit. He is the one member on the FDA VRBPAC committee that I trust. He was one of two members that voted against approving strain specific boosters at the VRBPAC meeting in June.
It is getting increasingly difficult to think it’s not a conspiracy when all of Europe and the UK approve the bivalent booster on nearly the same day - all without data or a solid indication.