Pfizer’s Shots Aren’t Safe and Were Never Shown to Be
Most studies are false and non-reproducible.
Amazing how unbreaking Twitter censorship and the passage of time allow for such aggressive repudiation of the “the science”.
Which is not my assertion as to validity (or not) of the claims, just that it’s about time we had a serious debate over the safety of the Jab, and it’s net harm, and for which cohorts it made sense, and for which it causes net damage. Heretofore, debate was prohibited, in the most grotesque anti-science theatre ever seen in modern history.
This article also includes comments by a data analyst, a person far more qualified than almost any doctor to weigh in on data. Data analysis is not part of a doctor’s field or training.
The Epoch Times: Pfizer’s Shots Aren’t Safe and Were Never Shown to Be
mRNA spike protein wasn’t the only thing autopsies found in people who died shortly after getting the jab. Combined with insurance datasets showing the increase in deaths had a 1 in 390,632,286,180 chance of occurring spontaneously, this is a dagger through the heart for Pfizer and their crew.
- Dr. Kathryn Edwards, a member of Pfizer’s data safety monitoring board (DSMB), was previously a paid adviser to Pfizer. DSMBs are supposed to be independent, and aren’t if members have previous relationships with the company
- German autopsies found “highly unusual tissue inflammation” in people who died shortly after getting the jab, and investigators suspect the inflammation observed would be fatal. They also found spike protein in the tissues of the deceased, but not another key part of SARS-CoV-2. This suggests the actual virus was not part of the problem; the only possible source of the spike protein was the jab
- Data from the German health insurance provider BKK, which covers about 10.9 million Germans, show 2.05% of COVID jab recipients sought medical care after their jab
- The largest German statutory health insurance dataset, which encompasses 72 million Germans, show massive increases in sudden and unexpected deaths after the COVID jabs rolled out
- December 13, 2022, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis petitioned the Florida Supreme Court for a statewide grand jury investigation of crimes and wrongdoing committed against Floridians related to the COVID-19 jabs. He also established an independent Public Health Integrity Committee to analyze and assess federal health guidance before they’re implemented in Florida
Contrary to the official narrative (and hence popular belief), the COVID shots have no demonstrated safety...
Data Analyst Calls for Immediate End to COVID Jabs
In the conclusion of his presentation, Lausen calls for the immediate suspension of the COVID jabs until correlation between the shots and death can be conclusively ruled out. He also calls for:
- Autopsies on all who died suddenly to determine what the massive increase is due to
- Mandatory recording of the COVID jab status of all deceased individuals, and the brand used, and regular publication of these data
- Immediate evaluation of the KBV data by German health authorities
- Informing all doctors and the population at large about the increase in diseases being reported post-jab
- Regular publication of KB e V data linked with COVID jab data held by the Paul Ehrlich Institute and the Robert Koch Institute (Germany’s public health institute)
The Shots Also Have Negative Effectiveness
In addition to not being safe, by any standard, the COVID shots are also negatively effective, meaning after 90 days, both Moderna’s and Pfizer’s shots make you more susceptible to COVID.
Florida Establishes Independent Public Health Committee
DeSantis is also implementing autopsy surveillance of post-jab sudden deaths, and has established a Public Health Integrity Committee,... the Committee, which will be overseen by Florida surgeon general Dr. Joseph Ladapo, consists of the following members:
- Jay Bhattacharya, MD, Ph.D.
- Martin Kulldorff, Ph.D.
- Tracy Beth Høeg, MD, Ph.D.
- Joseph Fraiman, MD
- Christine Stabell Benn, MD, Ph.D.
- Bret Weinstein, Ph.D.
- Steven Templeton, Ph.D.
WIND: Merry XMAS and Happy New Year. May we see some semblance of vigorous scientific debate in 2023.
The world-class experts on that committe must feel pretty good about finally getting a chance to repudiate the propaganda machine that abused them the past 2.5 years.