All Posts by Date or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
also by Lloyd: and

Links on this site earn me fees or commissions.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases @AMAZON

Designed for the most demanding needs of photographers and videographers.
Connect and charge all of your devices through a single Thunderbolt or USB-C port.

Esteemed Cardiologist: ‘Stop This Rollout Now’

re: ethics in medicine
re: follow the money
re: psyop and gaslighting and mass hysteria

Real science is never settled, and anyone who has certainty on such things is not qualified to discuss it.

Another cardiologist who did not get the memo?

Crazy guy... wait—this is Britain’s most influential cardiologist?! Why can’t he just follow The Science™ like all the other sheep experts?

And those MIT guys have gone and started thinking on their own too: MIT Expert Calls for Immediate Stop of mRNA COVID Jabs: Evidence Shows ‘Unprecedented Level of Harm’

See also: FDA Quietly Changes End Date for Study of Heart Inflammation After Pfizer COVID Vaccination
See also: Growing Number of Doctors Say They Won’t Get COVID-19 Booster Shots
See also: UN Initiative Targets and Doxes Doctors and Nurses Who Don’t Follow COVID-19 Narrative

Esteemed British Cardiologist: ‘Stop This Rollout Now

2023-01-26. Emphasis added.

Britain’s most influential cardiologist, who took two jabs, now calls for a halt in the rollout of the shot program after spending nine months evaluating the data. He offers a potential explanation for the differing world views.


  • Esteemed U.K. cardiologist, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, has called on Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to halt the rollout of the COVID-19 mRNA shots in light of the “ongoing unnecessary harm that is devastating individuals and families.”
  • He spent nine months analyzing studies, and now believes the program to inject people with a genetic experiment should be suspended immediately and has since joined a growing body of researchers, scientists, and doctors who do not follow the mainstream COVID narrative.
  • Malhotra reviewed the data with the chair of the British Medical Association (BMA). At the end of the conversation, the BMA chair commented, “I don’t think anybody has critically appraised the data as well as you have. Most of these people are getting their information on the vaccine from the BBC.”
  • Despite the high number of people who have taken the jab, the number of deaths has continued to rise—U.K. data show roughly 80 percent of all cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were in the vaccinated.
  • Of the excess number of 2021 non-COVID deaths, many were from heart disease, which is a known effect of the mRNA genetic jab.

...These numbers are also likely lower than the actual damage being done.5 One paper from Columbia University reports there were “146K to 187K vaccine-associated U.S. deaths between February and August 2021.”6

... Early in the pandemic, Malhotra took two doses of the Pfizer vaccine and went on Good Morning Britain to help tackle vaccine hesitancy. He shared what little information he had at the time, which he later learned was wrong. After months of evaluating the evidence, he says this about the current shot program:9

“We’re talking about one of the most poorly efficacious pharmacological interventions in the history of medicine with the worst side effect profile being the most lucrative and profitable. And when you try and join those dots together, the picture that it paints is extremely ugly. A real indictment on our whole healthcare system.”

Malhotra notes that to prevent one COVID death in people over 80 years, 230 people must take the shot. To prevent one death in people between people 70 to 80 years of age, 520 people must be jabbed. In people under 70 years, thousands must take the jab to prevent just one person from dying.


From the data that have been gathered since the shot program rolled out, Malhotra notes that while “The harm of the vaccine remains constant, the risk of COVID goes down.”11 Under normal circumstances, scientists and public health experts would not be debating this vaccine program. Instead, “it would have been pulled a long time ago.”


WIND: “extremely ugly” indeed — especially in light of what is really going on. Profit from harm, government endorsed and coerced. While correlation is not causation and I am not signing up for all the anti-Jab harm posturing, something is rotten in the state of medicine.

At the least, halt the appalling child abuse of vaccinating children and young people for COVID, who have nil risk.

The risks of the Jab continue to pop up like mushrooms after a rainstorm, with the NTT (number to treat) grossly unacceptable for anyone under 70 (or at least 60), particularly so since we can identify those most at risk and focus on that cohort for a maximal risk/reward.

No one of sound mind could have argued otherwise prior to COVID, but experts now have delusional cognitive commitments generated by the intense and ongoing psyops campaign over the past several years. It would involve psychologically distressing cognitive dissonance to reverse position, and probably firing by their Big Medicine employers for daring to do so. Trusting your employee doctor is for children and idiots; superhuman courage is required to speak freely and risk everything. But at least the California gag law on COVID has been stopped by a judge.

About 18 months or so ago, I pondered whether the mRNA gene therapy Jab might kill or injure more people than it (allegedly) saved, given the extremely high survival rate. We’ll never know for sure given the garbage data on everything, but of course that was the plan, which included intentionally breaking the original control groups and making sure to not look for issues. To be fair however, such death/injuries would have to be netted-out against the effects of COVID itself.

But none of that really matters: the core issue is and was a gross violation of human rights in coercing people to take an unwanted treatment—something that in the history of modern medicine would have been looked upon as a moral if not criminal offense.

Constitutional right?

Amendment 28 : Congress shall make no law compelling or coercing medical treatment, nor shall any agency of the government regulate as such.

View all handpicked deals...

Pentax 8x43 Z-Series ZD ED Binoculars
$849 $699
SAVE $150 | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
Mailing Lists | RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.
Display info: __RETINA_INFO_STATUS__