Real science is never settled, and anyone who has certainty on such things is not qualified to discuss it.
This is well within what I deem “possible to probable”. But maybe someone can properly debunk it.
Nobody can explain that. Some poo-poo these events saying that they happen all the time. True, they do. But not at this rate. Something happened in 2021 that changed things by a lot. Can you guess?
The numbers (as documented below) shows that there have been more “events” over a recent 4 month period than in over 20 years, which is more than a 60-fold increase in event rate.
All of these are in full public view so there is no “reporting bias” involved. And the numbers are big enough that nobody can say “oh, that’s just statistical noise.” Not a chance. It’s just too hard to explain...
Also, the Jessica Rose myocarditis paper that was unethically “temporarily” removed by Elsevier over the objection of the Editor of the journal and in violation of all known scientific protocols? Well, her paper had a very clear conclusion: the heart damage wasn’t confined to 16 year olds. It has a long tail. In other words, it can affect people of all ages, not just teenage boys. That’s what they don’t want you to know.
So now you know… the peer-reviewed science says that the heart damage isn’t limited to teenage boys. They are still unethically suppressing this as of Nov. 13, 2021.
WIND: I’m betting the cause-effect is the real deal. But I cannot evaluate these claims and of course some will be random chance. But a claim of 60X should be easy to debunk, right?
That’s the job of public health officials, who are eerily silent on such concerns. I’ve never heard a credibl public statement on side effects.
Video by Dr Robert Malone MD, inventor of the mRNA vaccines: https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1459187939116785664?s=20