Memory Upgrades for 2019 Mac Pro - Save Up to 65% vs Factory Costs
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$1450 $900
SAVE $550

$129 $84
SAVE $45

$2445 $2145
SAVE $300

$1199 $999
SAVE $200

$5699 $4699
SAVE $1000

$1799 $1349
SAVE $450

$2999 $2399
SAVE $600

$18599 $17599
SAVE $1000

$600 $400
SAVE $200

$274 $174
SAVE $100

$1149 $799
SAVE $350

$1499 $999
SAVE $500

$1799 $1349
SAVE $450

$1399 $1049
SAVE $350

$150 $50
SAVE $100

$380 $340
SAVE $40

$489 $389
SAVE $100

$274 $174
SAVE $100

$370 $330
SAVE $40

$420 $170
SAVE $250

$1499 $699
SAVE $800

$1499 $699
SAVE $800

$420 $170
SAVE $250

$369 $200
SAVE $169

$1699 $1399
SAVE $300

$1498 $998
SAVE $500

$999 $949
SAVE $50

$1099 $999
SAVE $100

SARS CoV2 aka COVID-19: Low Vitamin D Puts You at Risk; get it Via Sunlight

Correlation is not causation, and yet COVID-19 mortality is strongly associated with Vitamin D deficiency, and it has long been known that Vitamin D deficiency is associated with poor immune system function.

If you supplement with Vitamin D (e.g cholecalciferol), it is essential that you also supplement with magnesium as well as Vitamin K2.

Get your skin in the game!

Get 20 minutes of mid-day SUNLIGHT EVERY DAY on as much skin as possible for maximum Vitamin D production. You want the UV-B rays that are strongest at mid-day for maximum effect. This is how the human body evolved over eons to make Vitamin D. Do not use sunscreen except on sensitive areas like the face and scalp.

Dark skin? You may need much longer exposure because very dark skin can block up to 99% of UV-B rays—so unless you can spend hours with lots of skin in the sun, you’ll need to supplement.

Taking a statin? That's a fast way to a physical and mental health disaster. Among numerous other bodily functions, cholesterol is critical for Vitamin D production in the skin.

Yes, sunlight in moderation without sunscreen is healthy and necessary in spite of the idiotic claims made by the medical establishment which ignore its critical role in health. Whole body health is the ticket, and our genetic makeup doesn’t make Vitamin D via sunlight as some kind of accident!

If you do use sunscreen, stick to zinc oxide, which blocks (reflects away) all types of UV rays. My prediction is that in 10-20 years, it will be shown that most sunscreens contribute to skin cancer by suppressing the UV rays that are needed by the body for Vitamin D production (thus impairing the immune system that kills cancer cells early), and allowing through the UV rays that are associated with skin cancer.

Upgrade the memory of your 2019 iMac up to 128GB

Recommended Books for Health and Wellness

It’s your life at stake! If you just follow your doctor’s advice you’re in for a lifetime of problems! For doctor advice on nutrition , your doctor and/or medical organizations are just about the LAST place to look. See ethics in medicine and particularly.

This list from Your Doctor is NOT Responsible for Your Health—YOU Are! Recommended Reading to Open Your Mind and Ask the Right Questions.

Vitamin K2 and the Calcium Paradox by Dr. Kate Rhéaume-Bleue BSc ND

All about Vitamin K2.

Vitamin K2 might be the single most important vitamin of all, yet it was not until 2007 it as formerly identified.

Critically important read, particularly those supplementing with Vitamin D3. Very thorough look at the role Vitamin K2 (“Activator X”) plays in health, though knowledge of it lay semi hidden for nearly 80 years after its discovery by dentist Dr. Price.

The Magnesium Miracle by Carolyn Dean, MD, ND

All about magnesium.

Critically important read, particularly those supplementing with Vitamin D3 and/or calcium. Vitamin K2 along with magnesium is critical for bone health.

Eye opener, though it strikes me that Dr. Dean is too tightly coupled to her area of study and should consult with Dr. Kate Rhéaume-Bleue BSc ND of Vitamin K2 and the Calcium Paradox, and vice versa, for cross pollination of ideas and rigorous debate of a few points.

Curing the Incurable: Vitamin C, Infectious Diseases, and Toxins, 3rd Edition, by MD JD Thomas E Levy

All about Vitamin C.

Intravenous high-dose vitamin C can CURE polio in just 4 days, and ditto for many other infectious agents. It can also clear many toxins and poisons. Yet the modern medical profession takes a head-in-the-sand view of Vitamin C, letting people suffer and die instead of using it.

Lies My Doctor Told Me Second Edition: Medical Myths That Can Harm Your Health, by Ken D. Berry MD, FAAFP

This book confirms many of my pet theories. A few things I disagree with based on hard data of my own, namely the calories in/out thing for extreme athletes, though I do not dispute it for ordinary exercise. Point is, even if only 75% of the ideas here are correct (and I believe that is a very low estimate), then millions of people are being damaged by doctors.

The Truth about Statins, by Barbara H Roberts, MD

The Truth about Statins is shocking in revealing the intellectual fraud, financial conflicts of interest, shoddy studies, of the $30B statin industry. Statins are in effect a slow-acting poison on every system in the body. The original Ansel Keys cholesterol claims were such an intellectual fraud as to beggar belief. About 70% of side effects are dismissed and never reported by doctors, thus statins are “safe” (ask MD and astronaut Duane Graveline about that!).

All while diet has been proven to be superior to a statin for most people, and with numerous beneficial effects and no negative effects. A fact suppressed and ignored by nearly all of the medical establishment.

The Great Cholesterol Myth: Why Lowering Your Cholesterol Won't Prevent Heart Disease - and the Statin-Free Plan That Will, by Jonny Bowden Ph.D, C.N.S and Stephen Sinatra, M.D., F.A.C.C.

This book is in a similar vein as the above book.

The Great Cholesterol Con by Dr. Malcom Kendrick

Dr. Malcom Kendrick, MD, eviscerates, deracinates, destroys, and demolishes the diet-cholesterol myths and the LDL-heart risk frauds and the statin conspiracy (my term, not his explicitly). By citing directly the studies that purport to prove it. Fascinating work.

MDs—you don’t have to agree with everything or even most of it, but if you can 'walk away' after this blow-by-blow of so many medical lies rejecting them all, then you are harming your patients and have no business being an MD. Take the challenge of this and all the books I list, and run them through your head. Surely a trained MD can detect and discard bad arguments, so what do you have to lose? Problem is—the truth can never be forced out once it impinges, so you are warned. Study up on how to recognize cognitive dissonance in yourself before reading, holding yourself to the highest standards.

The intellectual fraud in the cholesterol and heart disease area and its incestuous amplification within the medical establishment is staggering. You do NOT need to be a doctor to understand the outrageous contradictions, financial conflicts of interest, lies, the ad-hoc instantiation of ad-hoc hypotheses constantly needed to fix the constantly changing cholesterol/heart disease theory, the selective omission of data, the biased choice of cohorts, the shameless dismissal of contrary data, etc.

IMO, if you are an MD and have NOT listened to The Great Cholesterol Con (or its equivalent), you might be intellectually and professionally ignorant and therefore incompetent to render advice on heart health. And thus harming your patients. You should just STOP until you can commit to a few hundred hours of this book and many others. I mean that with a tinge of real anger at the medical establishment (not a comment on any particular doctor), because when you learn what has actually come to pass in intellectual amplification, rationalization and sometimes outright intellectual fraud, you yourself should be very angry at how you were hoaxed and duped. If you are an older MD, how much of what you learned in medical school has been debunked or at least had doubt cast upon it?

The Big Fat Surprise: Why Butter, Meat, and Cheese Belong in a Healthy Die, by Nina Teicholz

This book should be required baseline reading for all DOCTORS at the least*, as it goes through 60 years of nutrition science (so much of it now debunked), based on eight years of reviewing the medical literature, and hundreds of interviews of leading experts, systematically addressing the sordid (my word for it) history of nutrition “science”. It is very thorough and objectively done, so consider it to be a baseline reference to be read FIRST before other lighter fare on nutrition.

My take-away is simple: most of what has passed for “healthy eating” is based on pseudo-science, outright debunked myths that persist even among doctors, financial conflicts of interest (doctors and food companies), and most of all: government recommendations that have a purely political/financial basis stemming from a “scientific” basis that any honest scientist would reject out of hand.

* Most doctors have nil training in nutrition, which is surely a good thing given the godawful state of nutrition science. And yet IMO food is by orders of magnitude more important than all medical drugs put together, in terms of public health in general, which is a train-wreck disaster here in 2020: soaring rates of obesity, diabetes and many other health problems which we can now treat much better, but whose underlying causes are surely diet in large measure.

Eat the Yolks, by Liz Wolfe

I do NOT recommend this book until AFTER you have read The Big Fat Surprise..., above. That’s because this book is more of a lifestyle book, whereas the The Big Fat Surprise is a blow-by-blow work that is needed to evaluate the suggestions in this book. That said, if you want a quick introduction that is an easy listen, this book is for you.

Eat Fat, Get Thin, by Mark Hyman

As with Eat the Yolks, my recommendation is the same: read The Big Fat Surprise first.


When: The Scientific Secrets of Perfect Timing, by Daniel H. Pink

How to make your effectiveness better, just by when you do things.

View all handpicked deals...

Nanlite MixPad 11 Tunable RGB Hard and Soft LED Panel
$129 $84
SAVE $45

Bone Health with Vitamin K2: Delicious Grass-Fed Ghee

Your Doctor is NOT Responsible for Your Health—YOU Are! Recommended Reading to Open Your Mind and Ask the Right Questions

Vitamin K2 is essential for bone health by carboxylating proteins that allow calcium into bones. No K2 means bone healt doesn’t happen. Yet most people get way too little vitamin K2, letting calcium float around and slowly deposite itself in all the wrong places. Vitamin K2 is thus also essential for preventing problems that result from excessive calcium in the diet. Think atherosclerosis. And magnesiumis also essential along with Vitamin K2.

READ: Health and Vitality Start with getting Key Nutrients

Getting Vitamin K2 can be tough in a world of factory foods and industrial meat—stay away from all such foods if you can; if a food has more than a few ingredients, it is probably a bad idea—eat unprocessd whole foods whenever possible.

Vitamin K2 sources

Do not assume that other brands or variants are equally good as those listed here.

Supplement choice: emu oil and Vitamin K2 supplements. I advise supplementing when food sources become problematic (e.g., in winter in particular) and/or just to hit it from all sides along with food.

Food choices, all excellent

In general, yellow animal fat indicates Vitamin K2 and beta carotene (both) and this has a distinct pleasant natural taste very different from factory meat/butter.

Tip: fry eggs or meat in grass-fed ghee or duck fat.

  • EPIC Duck Fat — top choice from food source without having to buy expensive grass-fed meat.
  • Grass-fed beef — real grass fed beef —beware of beef fed anything but fresh green growing grass, and avoid claimed grass-fed beef finished on corn.
  • Eggs from pasture-raised chickens. Yolks should be intensely orange and shells should be very strong —if not, the egg is nutritionally deficient.
  • Natto, if you like slimy stinky stuff.
  • Grass-fed ghee. Should be yellow and made ONLY when the cows are eating fresh green growing grass. Excellent high-grade choices are Grass-Fed Ghee by 4th & Heart and Bulletproof Grass-Fed Ghee.
Bulletproof Grass-Fed Ghee, 4th & Heart Grass-Fed Ghee
Which Camera System 📷 is Best?
Which Lenses to Choose?🌈

Avoid costly mistakes and get the ideal system for your needs: diglloyd photographic consulting.

UPDATE on Mercedes Sprinter Issues and Breakdowns: Sprinter Will Not Move, RPMs Drop Very Low

See details in: Mercedes Sprinter Issues and Breakdowns: Sprinter Will Not Go, RPMs Drop Very Low (Normal idle, put into D or R, RPMs drop, Engine Lugs

Charles H writes in July 2020:

Just wanted to let you know I am dealing with what looks to be the same situation now. In my case, I have a 2018 170 ext 4x4 that has ~6200 miles on it.

Recently encountered this same problem when starting the van after it has been sitting multiple hours, either overnight, or all day (engine is cold). The van will start immediately, as before. However, if I put the van in gear (either D or R) and press the accelerator, the engine RPMs do not change (or drop slightly), and the van either doesn't move, or moves very slowly. There are no indicators or warning lights. Once it warms up, anywhere from 3-5 minutes, it drives normally, and if turned off, will restart and drive without issue. This behavior has only happened when we are above 8000 feet (in the Eastern Sierras).

The air temperature has been between 58-80°F for the times this has occurred. The first time this happened was about a month ago, since then it has been occurring with a greater frequency.

I took it to the dealership in San Diego where we purchased it. They said there were no codes and that if it happened again I should leave the van with them for a week or so.

I'm not sure if this behavior is altitude related; if it is they probably won't ever find the problem in San Diego. They were also suggesting a service A, at a cost of $794, which seems high to me. I'm not sure if there is a software update that needs to be installed or not, but I haven't had any software updates installed yet, so this occurred in a "stock" vehicle.  It also hasn't occurred when at sea level and below 40 F.  Tom S suggested to start with looking at the EGR, and indicated that sometimes either at altitude or in cold weather the EGR will stick open until the engine warms up, at which time it will begin to work.  So, I'm going to be looking into that.

WIND: as of July 2020, I am pretty sure that altitude is a factor, since I experienced the same stall multiple times in May 2020 at an altitude of ~8000 feet and temperatures in the 50° to 60°F range. However, cold temperatures may exacerbate it. I had a transmission part replaced in March 2020, the stall is still there, and the dealer has nothing further to say about—they have given up. God help us getting this damned bug fixed by Mercedes—it may be mechanical, but I suspect a software bug.

Mercedes “Service A” is a major ripoff: it’s an oil change overpriced by 4X. I have my Sprinter oil changed at Jiffy Lube for a grand total of about $160 including a $20 Mercedes oil filter and $90 of super premium oil (far superior to the Mobil 1 garbage oil that Mercedes dealers use). Compare that to the $794 cost above.

Up to 1527MB/s sustained performance

COVID-19: Emergence of the Aggressive Social Conformity Agressors

See SARS CoV2 aka COVID-19: Time to Steepen the Curve and Accelerate Infection of Low-Risk People.

Readers know that I have been a vocal proponent of (effective) face masks and called for them early and loudly. Indeed I urged readers to buy masks while they could be had way back in January, seeing COVID-19 for what it was well before the clueless experts caught on.

We know now objectively that while COVID-19 can be a killer, it is not much more than a blip versus the overall death rate* and the overreaction is killing people, probably far more than COVID-19 will ever kill.

But masks are not for everyone. And at this point, except for the good ideas of high-risk people protecting themselves with properly fitted N95/N100 masks and certain facilities and similar measures, I deem masks dubious at best—hugely leaky, worn wrong and largely now counter-productive. The right thing is to aim for for high rates infection of low-risk people ASAP and to make sure those who want or need to protect themselves have a supply of N95/N100 masks.

* Graph the latest alleged COVID-19 deaths versus the baseline death rate, and see for yourself.

Gary J writes:

Masks are not innocuous.  I am a septuagenarian with diminished lung capacity.

N100 mask gave me headaches and breathlessness.  Had to wear mask (surgical) at banker meeting for half an hour.  Afterwards barely made it to car before passing out. Woke up to find I had left car door.

Also I have a congenital anomaly that results in aspirating certain food particles.

Moist environment caused by mask aggravates the effects of that condition.

Yet I have people yelling at me for not wearing a mask.  (At Huntington Gardens in San Marino, California they had employees driving golf carts around using megaphones telling people to keep masks on even when isolated.)

WIND: surgical masks are a BAD JOKE in terms of protecting an elderly person from infection. But masks as commonly used today are about protecting others from an infected person.

Gary J should see if he can find a 3M valved N95 or N100 mask (the valve blocks inhalation but allows exhalation). These should allow plenty of airflow versus unvalved masks. But even a valved mask can cause issues from some people with impaired lung function.

We have gone far beyond the point of social acceptance of masks to mass conformity, which brings with it all the ugly behaviors of self-righteous enforcers. Permission not needed to harrass and even attack the non-conformers.

Social conformity has long been an organizing principle of human society. It is useful, but also vicious. We are now seeing the vicious side emerge. You may justifiably consider yourself a patriot for wearing a mask to protect others, but the second you start harassing others in outdoor spaces, you have crossed the line to being an asshole or worse.

Do I wear a mask? Sure, out of respect to others (if only to allay their fears), and in a more practical sense: to avoid assholes harassing me. But since I am all but certain I already had and got over COVID-19, I consider it a useless nuisance for me—it’s all about social conformity now.

Upgrade the memory of your 2019 iMac up to 128GB

Up to 300 Million People May Be Infected by COVID-19, Stanford Guru John Ioannidis Says + Feckless Leaders Killing People

See SARS CoV2 aka COVID-19: Time to Steepen the Curve and Accelerate Infection of Low-Risk People.

The economic and personal carnage from COVID-19 continues. No, not from the virus.

Dr. Ioannidis: Globally, the lockdown measures have increased the number of people at risk of starvation to 1.1 billion, and they are putting at risk millions of lives, with the potential resurgence of tuberculosis, childhood diseases like measles where vaccination programs are disrupted, and malaria.

At 1000 times less than the impact of the 1918 flu (see interview), COVID-19 is now a world-wide tragedy because of feckless “leaders”. These politicians are indirectly killing and damaging people by the tens of millions (a gross underestimate). They are unwilling or unable to use any rational form of risk assessment. And that includes most “experts”—nothing more than fools sporting fancy degrees but lacking all wisdom and perspective of the real world.

Protect the high-risk population with special measures, but let everyone else get on with life. Because people are literally dying and many more will die from the bad policies in place.

But not all experts are fools—see the excerpts below.

The “leadership” is needlessly destroying lives and indirectly killing people, all for something that is now known to be little more than a blip versus overall death rates (check out the California baseline death rate vs COVID as just one example).

It is no accident that the social programming* “reporting” on the infection rate is a daily mainstay while the death rate is all but ignored. And not a peep is heard of the only meaningful metric for managing this crisis: the excess death rate — deaths vs expected baseline deaths had COVID-19 not occurred.

Worse, the “death rate” does not take into account lifespan years. The vast majority of COVID-19 deaths are of those having comorbidities—in other words, they might have died at the drop of a hat from just about anything just about any time. Sad no matter what, but most such victims had little life left and of poor quality (pain and suffering, dementia, etc).

If an 81 year-old requiring special care has a life expectancy of a few (low quality) life-years at best, why are we crushing the lives of tens of millions of low-risk people and literally killing younger people from other causes, people who lose 20/30/40 lifespan years? From a public health policy perspective, this is not just bad risk management, it is cruel and vicious.

* The propaganda produced by the “media”, which was once known as “news”.

Up to 300 Million People May Be Infected by Covid-19, Stanford Guru John Ioannidis Says

Emphasis added.

Leading epidemiologist Dr. John Ioannidis of Stanford University estimates that about 150-300 million or more people have already been infected by COVID-19 around the world, far more than the 10 million documented cases.

In an interview with Greek Reporter, the Greek American scientist warns, however, that the draconian lockdowns imposed in many countries may have the opposite effect of what was intended. “Globally, the lockdown measures have increased the number of people at risk of starvation to 1.1 billion, and they are putting at risk millions of lives,” he says.

It was just three months ago, soon after the onset of the coronavirus outbreak in the US, when Dr. Ioannidis wrote an article for the journal STAT excoriating the US and other countries for not conducting enough testing, and deploring how little real evidence there was of true infection rates, which he feared might soar and create widespread societal unrest.

Dr. Ioannidis:  ...a very crude estimate might suggest that about 150-300 million or more people have already been infected around the world, far more than the 10 million documented cases. It could even be substantially larger, if antibodies do not develop in a large share of people who get through the infection without symptoms or sparse symptoms.

Dr. Ioannidis: 0.05% to 1% is a reasonable range for what the data tell us now for the infection fatality rate, with a median of about 0.25%. The death rate in a given country depends a lot on the age-structure, who are the people infected, and how they are managed. For people younger than 45, the infection fatality rate is almost 0%. For 45 to 70, it is probably about 0.05-0.3%. For those above 70, it escalates substantially, to 1% or higher for those over 85. For frail, debilitated elderly people with multiple health problems who are infected in nursing homes, it can go up to 25% during major outbreaks in these facilities.

Dr. Ioannidis:  ...COVID-19 has become a notifiable disease so it is readily recorded in death certificates. What we do know, however, is that the vast majority of people who die with a COVID-19 label have at least one and typically many other comorbidities. This means that often they have other reasons that would lead them to death. The relative contribution of COVID-19 needs very careful audit and evaluation of medical records.

Dr. Ioannidis: ...In terms of numbers of lives lost, so far the COVID-19 impact is about 1% of the 1918 influenza. In terms of quality-adjusted person-years lost, the impact of COVID-19 is about 0.1% of 1918 influenza, since the 1918 influenza killed mostly young healthy people (average age 28), while the average age of death with COVID-19 is 80 years, with several comorbidities.

Dr. Ioannidis: The predictions of most mathematical models in terms of how many beds and how many ICU beds would be required were astronomically wrong. Indeed, the health system was not overrun in any location in the USA, although several hospitals were stressed. Conversely, the health care system was severely damaged in many places because of the measures taken.

Dr. Ioannidis: ...“Major consequences on the economy, society and mental health” have already occurred. I hope they are reversible, and this depends to a large extent on whether we can avoid prolonging the draconian lockdowns and manage to deal with COVID-19 in a smart, precision-risk targeted approach, rather than blindly shutting down everything... Globally, the lockdown measures have increased the number of people at risk of starvation to 1.1 billion, and they are putting at risk millions of lives, with the potential resurgence of tuberculosis, childhood diseases like measles where vaccination programs are disrupted, and malaria. I hope that policymakers look at the big picture of all the potential problems and not only on the very important, but relatively thin slice of evidence that is COVID-19.

WIND: there you have it, a voice of sanity. Glad to see that at least one expert has something adult to say.

Will our leaders listen? Nope.

Since our leaders will not listen and persist in killer policies, the public is wholly justified in revolting against restrictions that damage lives and livelihoods for years or decades to come based on false premises and GIGO data and feckless risk management.

Oh, and that’s setting aside the deaths caused by infantile COVID-19 policies, which will at this point will surely dwarf deaths from COVID-10 itself. Killer politicians are in control.

Where does the Constitution allow for constitutional rights to be blasted away by fiat, for a pandemic or other reason? These leaders are wiping their asses using the Constitution as toilet paper. Calling COVID-19 a “war” does not cut it. Shame on the feckless Supreme Court—a politicized and polarized group of out of touch losers unable and unwilling to protect the most basic rights this country was founded on.

Up to 1527MB/s sustained performance

PubMed: Short-term Magnesium Deficiency Downregulates Telomerase, Upregulates Neutral Sphingomyelinase and Induces Oxidative DNA Damage in Cardiovascular Tissues: Relevance to Atherogenesis, Cardiovascular Diseases and Aging

See prior posts on magnesium and magnesium deficiency.

Short-term Magnesium Deficiency Downregulates Telomerase, Upregulates Neutral Sphingomyelinase and Induces Oxidative DNA Damage in Cardiovascular Tissues: Relevance to Atherogenesis, Cardiovascular Diseases and Aging

Summary below from Dr. Carolyn Dean, M.D., N.D.

Aging and Magnesium Deficiency

It’s common knowledge that over the age of sixty-five, many people show metabolic decline, with the appearance of atherosclerosis, hypertension, cardio vascular diseases, and type 2 diabetes, culminating in congestive heart failure. All of the attributes of aging have been associated clinically and experimentally with magnesium deficiency. The authors make the following very important observation: “The aging process is also associated with an increase in the levels of proinflammatory cytokines in tissues and cells all present in Mg-deficient animals, tissues, and different cell types.”

Oxidative Stress, Telomerase, and the Heart Certain markers of oxidative stress appear in cardiovascular tissues and DNA with an accompanying decrease in ionized magnesium levels. This indicates that magnesium deficiency could lead to multiple mutations in the genomes of multiple cell lines. The Alturas’ study shows that magnesium deficiency shaves off the ends of telomeres, which can be equated with aging and cardiovascular changes including hypertension, decreased ejection fraction, and cardiac failure.

Magnesium Deficiency and Endothelial Damage Studies by the Alturas in the late 1980s demonstrated changes in the endothelial lining of blood vessels due to magnesium deficiency. The Alturas say that magnesium’s importance in controlling microcirculation and in lipid buildup in the arterial walls is still being overlooked by the next generation of researchers.

[WIND: more like willfully ignored by sticking to dogmatic mainstream echo-chamber status-based “thinking”, a de-facto proof of systemic ethical misconduct in the research field, see recommended books].

Magnesium Deficiency  and  Chronic  Stress Recent studies confirm that short-term magnesium deficiency causes marked reduction in heart cellular glutathione and in cells activating nitric oxide synthases that protect DNA. These findings support the theory that magnesium deficiency can cause mutations in many types of cells.

Magnesium Deficiency and Heart Failure All studies to date have confirmed, experimentally and clinically, that congestive heart failure is an inevitability by age seventy-five to eighty-five for people in magnesium-deficient states.

Magnesium and Cell Signaling for the Heart In the mid-1990s, the Alturas theorized that magnesium ions function as extracellular signals in the pathobiology of cardiovascular disease. A total of forty-two studies now support that theory. Magnesium has a critical role in the regulation of cardiac hemodynamics; vascular tone and reactivity; endothelial functions; carbohydrate, nucleotide, and lipid metabolism; prevention of free radical formation; and stabilization of the genome. Another seventeen studies find that magnesium has a crucial role in control of calcium uptake, subcellular content, and subcellular distribution in smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, and cardiac muscle cells.

Magnesium Deficiency  and  Genotoxicity Summing up the role of magnesium in our genes, the Alturas point out that magnesium deficiency can induce cell cycle arrest (and senescence), can initiate programmed cell death, and is associated with DNA damage (genotoxic events). These magnesium- deficiency-related changes can occur in multiple cell types, including cardiac and vascular smooth muscle cells. Of note is that atherosclerotic plaque in the arterial walls of hypertensive patients shows considerable DNA damage, activation of DNA repair pathways, increased expression of p53 (a tumor suppressor protein), oxidation, apoptosis, and increased levels of ceramide (a waxy lipid).

In addition to the important role of therapeutic amounts of magnesium daily, diet, exercise and the quality of your mind space play roles in longevity and wellness.  Tonight on my radio show we’ll disc

WIND: the allopathic medical establishment is wholly incompetent at preventing disease or improving health, remains willfully clueless on magnesium deficiency and nutrition in all forms, and remains committed to the hippocratic-oath-breaking mentality of one symptom / one diagnosis / one drug practices.

* Indeed the mainstream medical profession has in effect been about inducing disease and damaging health for decades now, by virtue of terrible advice on diet and heart health, along with total ignorance of nutrition and disdain for preventing illness in the first place by rigorous study. Instead the industry has become all about expensive drugs to treat preventable conditions. The medical establishment is utterly corrupt intellectually and ethically and financially. Talk to any honest MD and you’ll hear very disturbing things about how medicine is now practiced.

OWC Envoy Pro EX SSD
Blazingly fast Thunderbolt 3 SSD!

Up to 4TB capacity, USB-C compatible.

USB-C model also available

Great for travel or for desktop!

Response from my Doctor on COVID-19 Antibody Test

See SARS CoV2 aka COVID-19: Time to Steepen the Curve and Accelerate Infection of Low-Risk People.

Back in April, I suffered through 2.5 weeks of issues that corespond to the onset, duration and symptoms of COVID-19. I have long since recovered, with no ill effects that I am aware of.

A few days ago, I wrote a note to my internist doctor asking for the COVID-19 IgG antibody test. I just wanted to confirm that what I had was indeed COVID-19. I thought that the IgG test had a ~100% test specificity, but now I don’t know what to think on test accuracy.

Doctor response to my inquiry

Name and facility obfuscated. Emphasis added.

Sure, I can order the antibody blood testing though if you want me to order that.

Here's some additional information about the antibody test though which I recommend you read. . This test isn't for everyone and there are limitations to what it tells us.

The antibody test is not a perfect test there can be fairly high amounts of false results. Many infectious disease specialists aren't recommending these be done routinely.  In theory the antibody test would be helpful to tell us if you really had the infection and were immune, however it isn't guaranteed to be the case if people test positive.  For our own ******* health lab I have heard the sensitivity and specificity are not so good and we get a more false positive results.  Any positive results also will be reported to the public health department might need further followup testing and/or isolation.

Stanford has a better antibody test that apparently has better sensitivity and specificity than the one available at Quest but I don't have the actual numbers on that. We can still draw your blood for the test at our labs and have it sent over to Stanford to be analyzed.  I don't know the cost for these tests at this time either but have heard it might be about $70 or it might be covered completely by insurance.

If you still want this test, I would recommend the Stanford antibody test to be drawn by our lab for you and then I can place the order for you.  

Also, you have to be free of symptoms and exposures and you have to answer questions within two days before you come to our lab. We are required to ask you the following questions.

1. In the last 7 days, have you experienced any of the following New or Worsening symptoms: cough, breathing problems, fever, chills, muscle pain, sore throat, headache, vomiting, diarrhea or loss of taste or smell?
2. In the last 14 days, have you had close contact with someone diagnosed with COVID-19?
3. Do you currently live in a Skilled Nursing or Long Term Care Facility?
4. Do you currently live in an Assisted Living Facility or a Shelter?

 If any of these symptoms change within the next day or so please give us a call so that we can further discuss the next steps.

WIND: As I have no interest in having the county health department order me into self-quarantine for two weeks, I do not intend to get a test at this time.

Speaking to my prior post, it’s clear that this doctor lacks confidence in the test accuracy at the facility he is employed in. That facility is using an inferior test according to this doctor! What does that tell you about all the GIGO data used to formulate public policy?

OWC Accelsior 4M2 PCIe SSD
6000 MB/sec!
Mac or PC.

Ideal for Lightroom, Photoshop, video.
Capacity up to 16TB!

Experts and the Media are Engaged in COVID-19 Propaganda Based on Error-Prone Tests (test sensitivity and test specificity)

See SARS CoV2 aka COVID-19: Time to Steepen the Curve and Accelerate Infection of Low-Risk People.

With COVID-19, science is more of a slogan than anything approaching reality. Our “experts” continue to equate positive infection test results from highly suspect tests with actual infections.

COVID-19 tests in use have error rates that makes the results highly suspect, particularly when applied to largely uninfected populations. And there is no significant randomized selection for testing—as anti-scientific as it gets.

The tests cannot even be considered as valid science, since few have been validated under myriad varying collection conditions (e.g. the nasal swab tests).

COVID-19 deaths in California are barely a blip, yet the economic destruction proceeds apace, with Palo Alto (for example) a ghost town compared to its usual beehive activity.

False positive and false negative

Suppose that 1000 uninfected people are tested. If the test specificity is 97%, then 30 people will test as infected (false positive)!

Next, test 1000 infected people. If the test sensitivity is 97%, then 30 people will test as not infected (false negative), and they will go on to infect others.

Just try getting authoritative (non marketing, independent peer-validated research) on the real false positive and false negative rates. The news is propaganda, press releases are not credible. Yet lives and businesses are being destroyed by the heavy hand of government using this anti-science GIGO “data”.

With COVID-19, the accuracy of testing depends on which test is used, the type of specimen tested, how it was collected and the duration of illness. Combine that with false positives and false negatives and count me out on giving the data credibility.

Understanding medical tests: sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value

Sensitivity measures how often a test correctly generates a positive result for people who have the condition that’s being tested for (also known as the “true positive” rate). A test that’s highly sensitive will flag almost everyone who has the disease and not generate many false-negative results. (Example: a test with 90% sensitivity will correctly return a positive result for 90% of people who have the disease, but will return a negative result — a false-negative — for 10% of the people who have the disease and should have tested positive.)

Specificity measures a test’s ability to correctly generate a negative result for people who don’t have the condition that’s being tested for (also known as the “true negative” rate). A high-specificity test will correctly rule out almost everyone who doesn’t have the disease and won’t generate many false-positive results. (Example: a test with 90% specificity will correctly return a negative result for 90% of people who don’t have the disease, but will return a positive result — a false-positive — for 10% of the people who don’t have the disease and should have tested negative.)

Protect Your Phone
NuGard KX Case for iPhones and iPads.
Outstanding protection against drops and impact!
Plus, excellent grip for wet hands, cycling, etc.

COVID-19: Public Policy Uses the Infection Rate, but ignores the Key Metric —  do Experts have Functioning Brains in Terms of Minimizing Damage?

See SARS CoV2 aka COVID-19: Time to Steepen the Curve and Accelerate Infection of Low-Risk People.

With more testing and more people mingling and getting infected, the news media is all agog about the rising number of infections. Which is a highly misleading thing unless referenced against the testing rate—which uses unreliable tests and self-selection sampling. The data remains GIGO and does not pass muster as defensible science.

Still, it seems clear that there are a lot more infections. And that is a Good Thing: unless we want to drag out the misery for years and put high-risk people at continuous risk for a long time, the right thing to do is to infect as many low-risk people as fast as possible, while protecting high-risk people and ensuring that treatment capacity remains well within sustainable limits. Try finding that thought process in the mainstream news media or from any experts.

Given that COVID-19 is not going away and must run its course, the only metric that matters is whether medical facilities can handle the influx of those needing COVID-19 care. How many people are infected is a counterproductive proxy for the core issue of reaching herd immunity while minimizing damage.

It is unethical to in effect kill people by delay in medical treatment for numerous other medical reasons (cancer, heart disease, diabetes, deaths resulting from economic stress, etc) But that is exactly what public policy continues to do. The failure of our experts to take on the responsibility of fixing the broken narrative has several explanations, none of which should give anyone confidence in 'experts'.

In the end, deaths from COVID-19 might pale in comparison from needless deaths from other causes because no experts are calling for a proper risk management approach. And many of the CV19 deaths are in high-risk people with short expected lifespans who might have died within a few years in any case. I have two parents about 80 years old and I don’t want to lose them to COVID-19, but as public policy goes we should be talking about loss of lifespan of the population, not about absolute numbers of deaths.

Meanwhile, allopathic medical doctors fail to make any connection between baseline health and nutrition and nutrient deficiency, particularly Vitamin D, Vitamin C, magnesium. And thus those who should be preventing severe cases of COVID-19 sit around doing nothing to increase the baseline health of the population, let alone look into relatively cheap treatments like intravenous Vitamin C, proven to kill even nasty viruses like poliomyelitis.

Is it too cynical to suggest that attention to last-gasp $3000 drug treatments for severely-ill COVID-19 patients are displacing inexpensive nutritional support that could be applied to an entire population to save tens of thousands of lives, if not more? This is the same broken record of statins versus magnesium deficiency—the morally and financially corrupt medical establishment avoiding prevention like the plague in favor of dubious treatments for life-threatening conditions—see for example Subclinical magnesium deficiency: a principal driver of cardiovascular disease and a public health crisis. It’s not much different than buying a new car and never changing the oil, then continuously fixing all the broken parts.

Up to 1527MB/s sustained performance

Science Daily: “Declining Eyesight Improved by Looking at Deep Red Light” — Retinal Mitochondrial Health

Among other improvements from magnesium supplementation and especially lung function, recent magnesium supplementation gives me the distinct impression that my dim-light eyesight has improved, though I have no hard data to back up that claim.

Some caution is advised, as this is a very small study (cohort of 12 male and 12 female subjects).

Science Daily: Declining Eyesight Improved by Looking at Deep Red Light

Staring at a deep red light for three minutes a day can significantly improve declining eyesight, finds a new UCL-led study, the first of its kind in humans.

Scientists believe the discovery, published in the Journals of Gerontology, could signal the dawn of new affordable home-based eye therapies, helping the millions of people globally with naturally declining vision.


In humans around 40 years-old, cells in the eye's retina begin to age, and the pace of this ageing is caused, in part, when the cell's mitochondria, whose role is to produce energy (known as ATP) and boost cell function, also start to decline.

Mitochondrial density is greatest in the retina's photoreceptor cells, which have high energy demands. As a result, the retina ages faster than other organs, with a 70% ATP reduction over life, causing a significant decline in photoreceptor function as they lack the energy to perform their normal role.

Researchers built on their previous findings in mice, bumblebees and fruit flies, which all found significant improvements in the function of the retina's photoreceptors when their eyes were exposed to 670 nanometre (long wavelength) deep red light.

"Mitochondria have specific light absorbance characteristics influencing their performance: longer wavelengths spanning 650 to 1000nm are absorbed and improve mitochondrial performance to increase energy production," said Professor Jeffery.

... Professor Jeffery said: "Our study shows that it is possible to significantly improve vision that has declined in aged individuals using simple brief exposures to light wavelengths that recharge the energy system that has declined in the retina cells, rather like re-charging a battery.

"The technology is simple and very safe, using a deep red light of a specific wavelength, that is absorbed by mitochondria in the retina that supply energy for cellular function.

WIND: will this finding be noted among allopathic medical doctors given that it is prevention and not a treatment requiring an expensive drug treatment? It it holds up to scrutiny, could this effect improve other aspects of eye health?

Wavelength of 670nm is very deep red, close to the faux-infrared cutoff wavelength I have long favored for infrared photography of around 720nm. At least half the energy of sunlight is very deep red and infrared, a fact that a camera modified for IR will tell you just based on exposure time. So I wonder what simply going outdoors in bright sun achieves?

Protecting eyes from both UV and IR with sunglasses always seemed like the smart move, but now it seems that some infrared exposure might be a good thing: does getting out into the sun without sunglasses for a short period where there is a lot of reflected light (say a beach or snow) perhaps yield a dose of infrared that is beneficial for your eyes?

See also Death Valley Eureka Dunes in Infrared.

Eureaka Dunes in infrared
Eureaka Dunes in infrared
f9 @ 1/200 sec, ISO 200; 2007-02-24 13:35:54
Canon EOS 5D + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 24mm

[low-res image for bot]
OWC Mercury Elite Pro Dock

Up to 32TB Capacity!

Dual-drive solution from 4TB to 32TB, hardware RAID, USB ports, DisplayPort, gigabit ethernet, SD card reader.

Huge capacity in travel-friendly form-factor.

Summitting White Mountain Peak on Mountain Bike — Minimal Snow

The magnesium supplementation I’ve been doing has my lungs working as good as they have in a decade.

Which helped a lot with my 12-pounds-too-heavy body and out-of-shape legs as I worked higher and higher towards the 14252' summit of White Mountain Peak.

The road to the summit is largely free of snow requiring only short hike-a-bike diversions. Within a week the entire route should be ridable. My Moots Mooto X YBB performed flawlessly as usual—eight years and going strong.

View past Marmot Meadow to White Mountain Peak
f1.8 @ 1/2500 sec, ISO 20; 2020-06-19 14:36:00
iPhone 7 Plus + iPhone 7 Plus 4.0mm f/1.8 ENV: altitude 12825 ft / 3909 m

[low-res image for bot]
High point before descending to saddle prior to final summit pitch
f1.8 @ 1/2900 sec, ISO 20; 2020-06-19 14:53:00
iPhone 7 Plus + iPhone 7 Plus 4.0mm f/1.8 ENV: altitude 13127 ft / 4001 m

[low-res image for bot]
Snow cups at 13600', view to summit hut
f1.8 @ 1/12000 sec panorama, ISO 25; 2020-06-19 15:43:00
iPhone 7 Plus + iPhone 7 Plus 4.0mm f/1.8 ENV: altitude 13626 ft / 4153 m

[low-res image for bot]
Lingering snow not far below summit hut
f1.8 @ 1/8000 sec, ISO 20; 2020-06-19 16:15:00
iPhone 7 Plus + iPhone 7 Plus 4.0mm f/1.8 ENV: altitude 14067 ft / 4288 m

[low-res image for bot]
f1.8 @ 1/4600 sec, ISO 20; 2020-06-19 16:10:00
iPhone 7 Plus + iPhone 7 Plus 4.0mm f/1.8 ENV: altitude 14252 ft / 4344 m

[low-res image for bot]
f1.8 @ 1/2000 sec, ISO 20; 2020-06-19 16:25:00
iPhone 7 Plus + iPhone 7 Plus 4.0mm f/1.8
ENV: White Mountain Peak, altitude 14252 ft / 4344 m, 50°F / 10°C

[low-res image for bot]
View southeast from White Mountain Peak
f1.8 @ 1/4600 sec panorama, ISO 20; 2020-06-19 16:16:00
iPhone 7 Plus + iPhone 7 Plus 4.0mm f/1.8 ENV: altitude 14252 ft / 4344 m

[low-res image for bot]
View south from White Mountain Peak
f1.8 @ 1/2300 sec panorama, ISO 20; 2020-06-19 16:42:00
iPhone 7 Plus + iPhone 7 Plus 4.0mm f/1.8 ENV: altitude 14252 ft / 4344 m

[low-res image for bot]
View southeast to southwest from White Mountain Peak
f2.8 @ 1/1050 sec, ISO 20; 2020-06-19 16:42:00
iPhone 7 Plus + iPhone 7 Plus 4.0mm f/1.8 ENV: altitude 14252 ft / 4344 m

[low-res image for bot]
Selfie with Moots MootoX YBB on White Mountain Peak
f1.8 @ 1/2700 sec, ISO 20; 2020-06-19 16:34:00
iPhone 7 Plus + iPhone 7 Plus 4.0mm f/1.8
ENV: White Mountain Peak, altitude 14252 ft / 4344 m, 50°F / 10°C

[low-res image for bot]
Panorama to south from White Mountain Peak
f1.8 @ 1/4400 sec panorama 9 frames cylindrical, ISO 20; 2020-06-19 16:36:09
iPhone 7 Plus + iPhone 7 Plus 4.0 mm f/2.8 @ 28mm equiv (4mm)
ENV: White Mountain Peak, altitude 14252 ft / 4344 m, 50°F / 10°C

[low-res image for bot]
Tired and done
f1.8 @ 1/1000 sec, ISO 32; 2020-06-19 18:56:00
iPhone 7 Plus + iPhone 7 Plus 4.0mm f/1.8
ENV: White Mountain Road, altitude 11876 ft / 3620 m, 50°F / 10°C

[low-res image for bot]


Don’t Treat Asthma, CURE It! Magnesium Supplementation has Banished My Small Airway Pulmonary Issues; ZERO need for prescription inhaler for 3 weeks running

See also: Magnesium Personal Findings: Brain, Lungs and Asthma, Sleep, Urinary Flow, Muscle Spasms

Update July 2020: back at sea level for a week (where effects of altitude acclimatization are mostly gone), it feels like I hardly have to breathe even riding at a steady 210 watts (my bicycling power meter makes effort level rigorously objective). My heart rate is very low relative the power output. Clearly I am getting notably more efficient oxygen intake—the physiological evidence is compelling—I have tracked my performance for decades including recording power and heart rate for a decade, and what I am seeing is remarkable.

The ReMag magnesium I’ve been taking has my small airways working as good as they have in a decade. That and my total lack of need for any prescription inhaler is unprecedented in 30 years. And it’s especially remarkable given dust and pollen in recent weeks.

Best choice for magnesium supplementation
Best choice for magnesium supplementation

Yesterday, I rode to the summit of White Mountain Peak (14252' elevation) and my lung function was strikingly good. My muscle strength and anaerobic threshold not so much, but those are training issues—none done this year in those areas. However, the spectacular lung function significantly overcame the anaerobic threshold limitations.

Also I was able to breath through my nose (mouth closed) up to about 12800' on moderate grades and even right up to the summit so long as the grade was slight. That too is unprecedented; it means that my lungs are operating at high efficiency. And I have narrow nasal passages / sinuses that have not provided good airflow for years.

Finally, I also found that with only 36 hours acclimatization that I could hold my breath for 100 seconds at 11600' elevation, another indicator of outstanding lung function.

Finally finally: I am no longer sleeping and waking up with a woolly dry tongue; I am able to sleep and breathe through my nose instead of lapsing into open-mouth breathing, a known damager of overall health.


Curing instead of treating your asthma

I’m not saying that sensitive lungs will never be sensitive or that lungs won’t react to heavy pollen loads and such. But between getting magnesium levels up to snuff and perhaps using CBD as well, it might be that the need for prescription inhaler treatment will largely vaporize.

If you’re asthmatic and are assuming you must remain on a prescription inhaler forever, think again. Your condition will surely be improved if not cured by appropriate magnesium supplementation. Moreover, many prescription inhalers like albuterol have serious and dangerous rebound effects as well as losing effectiveness quickly. Dangerous stuff if you can avoid it.

Relying on expensive and risky prescription drugs foisted on patients by most allopathic medical doctors (near-zero training or knowledge of nutrition!), think this situation over and work with your doctor on moving away from prescription inhaler. Be warned however that 99% of MDs are grossly ignorant of nutrition and of magnesium and many if not most will be highly resistant to the idea and might scoff or even dismiss your inquiring mind out their own insecurity and ignorance (and/or harried schedule). And don’t get suckered into the highly unreliable serum magnesium test—see Testing for Magnesium Deficiency.

A chance meeting of an RN who works with dangerous asthmatic conditions

On the way up to the summit of White Mountain Peak, I ran into a fellow adventurer and we chatted for 10 minutes or so. I remarked on how well my lungs were working since I started magnesium supplementation. He (Chris) turned out to be an RN who tells me that they routinely use intravenous magnesium sulfate to treat severe asthma and can watch the lungs open up and relax in short order. It is highly effective and a go-to treatment.

What does that tell you about MDs who keep giving you prescription inhalers while never even discussing treating or curing asthma by fixing a nutritional deficiency? You have nothing to lose by fixing magnesium deficiency and a great deal to gain. If your MD won’t 'deal', seek out another.

OWC Accelsior 4M2 PCIe SSD
6000 MB/sec!
Mac or PC.

Ideal for Lightroom, Photoshop, video.
Capacity up to 16TB!

Testing for Magnesium Deficiency: the Magnesium RBC Test

Testing for magnesium deficiency is perhaps a waste of money since it is just smarter and easier to go directly to magnesium supplementation, given that the modern diet is highly deficient in magnesium, and the body quickly excretes any excess.zz

However, a test might be of interest and of some value in justifying magnesium supplementation to a wary physician who knows nothing about it.

If a magnesium test turns up a deficiency, other nutrient deficiency issues might be present as well, so think in terms of total nutrition since fixing one deficiency may leave others unaddressed. Optimal health requires full nutrition; no single nutrient can do that—see Health and Vitality Start with getting Key Nutrients.

Things you should know about testing for magnesium deficiency

You get get a magnesium RBC test at

  • The best available test is the magnesium RBC test. It is not as good as the ionized magnesium test, but it correlates strongly and the ionized magnesium is generally only available in research labs.
  • The serum magnesium test is highly misleading and unreliable. It an show high serum levels even with extreme tissue deficiency. You should either politely educate this doctor or find a different doctor, because s/he is working out of gross ignorance.

Things you should know about medical doctors and the medical establishment

  • Very few doctors have significant training in nutrition. Medical schools just don’t bother.
  • Few doctors are even aware of magnesium deficiency. Or the massive public health crisis that magnesium deficiency causes just in the realm of cardiovascular health, and that is the tip of the iceberg.
  • Sadly, in my own experience, many doctors have stopped learning and have little interest in prevention and cure and have an attitude of nothing to learn from their patients.
  • Most doctors take what they learned in some fixed medical textbook as more inviolate than the Bible. If it isn’t in there it doesn’t exist. If it is in there, it is The Gospel. This situation is a disaster for patients, particularly with older doctors who have not made the effort to continue training throughout their lives.

See also:

WSJ: U.S. Blood Reserves Are Critically Low

See all COVID-19 posts and all Vitamin C posts.

WSJ: U.S. Blood Reserves Are Critically Low.

Majority of nation’s blood banks have one-day supply or less of Type O blood, officials say.

The U.S. blood supply is at critically low levels after Covid-19 shutdowns have emptied community centers, universities, places of worship and other venues where blood drives typically occur.

The American Red Cross, which supplies about 40% of the nation’s blood, said more than 30,000 planned blood drives have been canceled since mid-March.

Even as some businesses, schools and community groups make plans to reopen in coming months, they have told the Red Cross they don’t anticipate sponsoring blood drives in the near future.

...The majority of the nation’s blood banks now have a one-day supply or less of Type O blood, according to blood bank officials. Typically, blood banks try to maintain a three-to-four-day supply. Type O blood is in the most demand because it can be given to people in any blood group.

...Blood banks, hospitals and other collectors are looking for ways to motivate people to come donate. The Red Cross is offering a $5 gift card via email to people who come in to donate through June 30. Last month, the organization offered a Red Cross T-shirt by mail to donors.

...Brian Gannon, chief executive of Gulf Coast Regional Blood Center in Houston, which serves around 175 hospitals and health-care institutions, said starting June 14 his center would test blood donations for antibodies to the Covid-19 infection, a motivational offer that other blood centers also have been making.


Give blood if you can. Many people cannot donate because of certain conditions or past infections, so the pool of donors is smaller than one might think.

I am an O+ blood type (widely compatible*) and I am considering giving blood, but doing so seems incompatible with high altitude hikes and thus my work, so I have not yet decided whether to proceed. I need to look at how much blood is taken and the recovery time and how it might impact my ability to work—I am in no position to give up any income whatsoever.

Getting paid for donating blood is not a consideration for me in this matter... but why are people not paid a market price for their blood? Outrageous hospital fees profit the medical industry handsomely—but that you cannot get paid good money for your own blood strikes me as a grotesque inversion of morality.

O-positive vs O-negative blood

The closest blood type to universal donor is O-negative blood, given to high risk patients such as preemies and children in need eg “pedipac”. Blood must test negative for CMV in particular for children, in addition to being free of a variety of other diseases.

For emergency transfusions, blood group type O negative blood is the variety of blood that has the lowest risk of causing serious reactions for most people who receive it. Because of this, it's sometimes called the universal blood donor type.

lood group types are based on proteins called antigens that are present on red blood cells. There are major antigens and minor antigens coating the red blood cells. Based on the major antigens, blood groups may be classified as one of these four types:
- Type A

- Type B
- Type AB
- Type O

Blood is also classified by rhesus (Rh) factor. If your blood has the Rh factor, you're Rh positive. If your blood lacks the Rh factor, you're Rh negative.

Ideally, blood transfusions are done with donated blood that's an exact match for type and Rh factor. Even then, small samples of the recipient's and donor's blood are mixed to check compatibility in a process known as crossmatching.

In an emergency, type O negative red blood cells may be given to anyone — especially if the situation is life-threatening or the matching blood type is in short supply.

Peter O writes:

I've given gallons of blood over the years, starting in high school (I'm now in my 40's). If you give in the traditional fashion (i.e., whole blood), they take 1 pint. I've always enjoyed the process, and personally have experienced a feeling similar to a runner's high for a few days after giving (although not always). Sometimes you get a green phlebotomist who has trouble finding the vein, but that's been rare. Never any major negative effects, but I'm not an endurance athlete, nor do I live at a high altitude. However I do run, bike, & hike, and like to think I'm in tune with my body. It seems to take a week to feel 100% back up to speed. They say you should wait ~56 days between donations, so I can only presume it takes roughly that long on average to fully restore your supply, but my guess is that varies based on health and nutrition.

I always give through the Red Cross. They do offer the alternative of giving platelets or plasma instead of whole blood. In each case, your blood is separated in a machine and red blood cells and plasma (or platelets) returned to you, which speeds up recovery time and limits stress on your body. I've never done this, but many people do. It takes a bit longer (~1.25 hrs) due to the separation process. Might be a better option if you are concerned about recovery time.

The toughest part is finding a place to donate and scheduling. They don't make it easy. I typically give at blood drives hosted by employers, but that is non-existent now with COVID/working from home. I think that's probably the biggest hit to blood supplies -- the lack of easy access to donate. Red Cross should really get the Bloodmobiles out into some of these suburban locations where folks are working from home and have time to give, if it's made more convenient.

WIND: I imagine that ordinary exercise is not much affected, But try working out at up to 95% of max heart rate even at sea level, and a loss of oxygen (blood carrying capacity) is a big deal, not to mention at 11800' where I am now. If it takes a week to feel normal with casual exercise, then serious training surely is much longer.

If you want less of anything, tax it, or charge for it, or add friction.

The blood donation situation hits 2 of those three points: you as a donor not only get no compensation but in effect have to shell out money to donate. The friction of time spent and thus income lost (for me at least) means very high friction. And that’s not even counting the physical impact.

I agree that access is too hard—for me it would scarf up nearly half a day by the time I drive/park/donate/wait/drive home. That’s a HUGE hit to me as a self-employed person. Why the hell should I donate half a day of my time (time = money) which in effect is writing a check for the privilege of donating blood? Why don’t I get a free health care visit with a doctor, as these institutions ream me with a huge bill for a basic 10-minute medical checkup e.g. $400 for a dermatology exam? This is a grossly unethical state of affairs in which the medical establishment profits at the expense of donors. The only thing that makes me consider donating blood is that there is a person out there who well benefit. The in-between stuff is disgusting.

Rainer U writes:

Concerning blood donations: I am a blood donator with the German Red Cross since many years and it never affected my cycling sports. They always take 500ml (= half a litre) and usually urge me not to enter races or embark onto very long tours for the next three days. This is it. Usually they tour the inner cities and market places with specially equipped trucks, which can process five donators simultaneously. So people can donate on-the-fly while they are in the city for shopping.

You are right that one could expect some kind of compensation for a donation. Sometimes they indeed hand out little presents (umbrellas, power banks and the like), but not on a regular basis.

For me it is, among other things, a contribution to the society. What I get in return is a safe life in a society which works quite well and helps me in times of trouble.

WIND: I’ll end up donating at some point, not for “society” but for that face or two I know I’ll have helped. But maybe that is saying the same thing a different way.

I think Europeans don’t quite understand how expensive and f*ed up our health care system is, so compensation for blood donation in the context of financial ruin for some of us takes on a whole new perspective. My financial life was destroyed by ObamaCare so it’s “personal” for me.

Up to 1527MB/s sustained performance

Physicians Weekly: “High-Dose IV Vitamin C on ARDS by COVID-19: A Possible Low-Cost Ally With a Wide Margin of Safety”

See all COVID-19 posts and all Vitamin C posts.

Best Vitamin C? It might be wise at the first sign of COVID-19 to use as much true Lypo-Spheric Vitamin C as your bowels will tolerate.

ARDS = Acute respiratory distress syndrome

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) occurs when fluid builds up in the tiny, elastic air sacs (alveoli) in your lungs. The fluid keeps your lungs from filling with enough air, which means less oxygen reaches your bloodstream. This deprives your organs of the oxygen they need to function.

ARDS typically occurs in people who are already critically ill or who have significant injuries. Severe shortness of breath — the main symptom of ARDS — usually develops within a few hours to a few days after the precipitating injury or infection.

Many people who develop ARDS don't survive. The risk of death increases with age and severity of illness. Of the people who do survive ARDS, some recover completely while others experience lasting damage to their lungs.

Physicians Weekly: “High-Dose IV Vitamin C on ARDS by COVID-19: A Possible Low-Cost Ally With a Wide Margin of Safety”

Note “intravenous Vitamin C” reference, a topic I discuss in Vitamin C: a cure for lethal viral infections including Poliomyelitis, and could it cure COVID-19? The Groundbreaking Work of Doctor F.R. Klenner and How It was Ignored.

Intravenous vitamin C has been the object of numerous studies regarding its function as adjuvant therapy on critical patients’ care, included ARDS of diverse etiology. In the context of a coronavirus pandemic, with an elevated morbimortality and pressure over the sanitary system, it is of vital importance to use every available resource to improve patients’ outcomes in an accessible and safe way. In this article, I briefly analyze the evidence around the use of vitamin C in the critical patient and its potential benefits on admission time, intubation time and mortality on patients affected by ARDS.

...Humans are one of the few vertebrates that can’t synthesize vitamin C, therefore it is considered to be an essential nutrient. It’s estimated that 7% of the general population is deficient in vitamin C, but this percentage increases to 47% in admitted patients...

...Therapeutic effects are achieved with plasmatic levels in the range of 20-49 mmol/L (100 times higher than those achieved by oral intake) only possible with intravenous infusion.

...Regarding the evidence around vitamin C’s mechanisms of action, certain preclinical findings might explain the effects observed on respiratory distress. Vitamin C down-regulates inflammatory genes and inhibits the cytokine storm responsible for the activation of pulmonary neutrophils, therefore protecting alveolar capillaries from inflammatory damage. In addition to this, it enhances alveolary fluid clearance by increasing the water transporter channel expression.

In regards to its safety, most studies report no adverse effects on large doses of vitamin C. On rare occasions, the following have been described: Hypersensitivity, oxalate urolithiasis, iron overload in haemochromatosis and anaemia among others, most of them with a prevalence less than 1%. It has also been described the inaccuracy of bedside glucometry when using vitamin C and it is advised to corroborate findings with laboratory results.

We live in times of incalculable need. Worldwide medical supplies are in shortage, costs threat to crush even the wealthiest of health care systems, and above all the wellbeing of millions of humans is at risk. Treatment of severe ARDS from COVID-19 is an ongoing challenge and a specific treatment could be months ahead. The evidence around vitamin C is scarce but promising. There probably never was and never will be a better time than the current to explore and make use of every possible tool that could allow us to improve patients’ prognosis and expand the body of evidence for the benefit of all.

Kudos to the doctor who wrote this! But the risks are far smaller than virtually all prescription drugs, so the excessive caution is just ridiculous. When proper risk assessment is done, it goes beyond idiotic to not to move aggressively to intravenous Vitamin C for impacted patients.

AWESOME to see at least some doctors saying that nutrition may be a factor in mitigating COVID-19—which of course it is—nutrition being the most imporant factor of all fir a strong immune system and that starts by avoiding all nutritional deficiencies.

The reason that admitted patients are deficient in Vitamin C is that Vitamin C is used by the body to combat viruses and bacterio and their toxins. Very high dose intravenous Vitamin C has been proven to CURE severe viral illnesses in as little as 4 days. But this fact is little known, not in the accepted medical textbooks and ignored by the allopathic (traditional ) medical establishment. Studies showing it doesn’t work are awesomely flawed in failing to use the protocols of F. R. Klenner and therefore erroneously “prove” that it does not work.

WHY are we letting patients go acute when multiple nutritional deficiencies can be addressed for the entire population at a cost per person far less than 0.1% of the cost of a hospitalization? Deficiencies of Vitamin D deficiency, magnesium deficiency are tightly linked to immune system function. And why is intravenous Vitamin C not a top worldwide health priority? Maybe the same reason that the allopathic medical establishment ignores magnesium deficiency as a driver of the suffering and death of tens of millions—money and arrogance. Word is getting out but very slowly because few doctors dare to do anything but follow dogmatic medical practice—a fundamentally unethical approach to human health.

See all posts on ethics in medicine and articles like A Prescription for Harm: the Modus Operandi of Modern Medicine.

Upgrade the memory of your 2019 iMac up to 128GB

Vitamin C: one of the Dietary Factors in preventing Macular Degeneration

See all COVID-19 posts.

Best Vitamin C?

WSJ: New Treatments for Macular Degeneration Are On the Way

Scientists may be just a few years away from delivering new treatments for age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading cause of irreversible vision loss in people more than 50 years old.

...“I’m cautiously optimistic that we will have markedly improved treatments for both wet and dry AMD within two to three years,” says Joshua Dunaief, professor of ophthalmology at the Scheie Eye Institute at the University of Pennsylvania.


Great! But why not prevent it in the first place? So now we need dangerous drugs to treat so manh conditions that could be prevented and sometimes cured by simple and indexpensive dietary supplements.

If medical doctors were doing their jobs instead of the elephant-in-the-room rampant medical malpractice of ignoring nutritional deficiences, the rate of hundreds of illnesses would plumment (hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, asthma, mental illness)... including macular degeneration.

Magnesium Deficiency Differentially Affects the Retina and Visual Cortex of Intact Rats

...our results suggest that the influence of Mg-D on the intact visual system may be different from previous studies that used isolated retinas. This difference may depend not only on the hyperactivity of the NMDA receptor, but also on the behavior of the Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions in the intact eye.

BMJ: Diet patterns and the incidence of age-related macular degeneration in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study

Several studies suggest AMD patients should pay close attention to what they eat.

A study by researchers at the University at Buffalo published in the December issue of the British Journal of Ophthalmology found that participants who ate an “American diet” high in red and processed meat, fried food, refined grains and high-fat dairy were three times as likely to develop advanced AMD as participants who were deemed “prudent” eaters.

Diet appeared to play no role in the incidence of early AMD. The study was adjusted for age, race, education, calorie intake and smoking status.

That followed the publication in March 2019 of a 21-year study of nearly 5,000 participants in Europe that found those who adhered to a Mediterranean diet—as measured by nine components, including the consumption of vegetables, fruits, fish and legumes—had a 41% reduced risk of developing advanced AMD. The study was published in Ophthalmology, the journal of the American Academy of Ophthalmology. “Of the nine components, the most important was eating fish twice a week,” says Emily Chew, director of the National Eye Institute Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications and chair of the National Institutes of Health’s Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2. “Particularly for people who have protective genes associated with AMD, the fish effect is almost like a two-thirds reduction in the disease.”

Since the completion of the first Age-Related Eye Disease Study in 2001, AMD patients have been encouraged to take a high-dose supplement of vitamins and minerals including vitamin C, vitamin E and lutein, a formulation that has been shown in clinical trials to reduce the progression to late AMD by 25%.

“Fish” as perhaps in Omega 3 fatty acids, below?

In general, the pattern of studies is that you find what you look for. Most researches are not at all creative, not even looking for things like magnesium deficiency, or using highly unreliable tests or making false assumptions about blood levels instead of tissue levels. So it’s important to look at many many studies.

Nutritional Modulation of Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in the elderly worldwide. It affects 30–50 million individuals and clinical hallmarks of AMD are observed in at least one third of persons over the age of 75 in industrialized countries (Gehrs et al., 2006). Costs associated with AMD are in excess of $340 billion US (American-Health-Assistance-Foundation, 2012). The majority of AMD patients in the United States are not eligible for clinical treatments (Biarnes et al., 2011; Klein et al., 2011). Preventive interventions through dietary modulation are attractive strategies because many studies suggest a benefit of micro and macronutrients with respect to AMD, as well as other age-related debilities, and with few, if any, adverse effects...


Photoreceptors are exposed to an extensive amount of oxidative stress in the form of light and oxygen... The chemical nature of nutrients should help predict which nutrients are crucial for the retina. Being a highly lipophilic tissue that is subject to environmental and age-related oxidative stress, one might anticipate that maintaining adequate levels of lipophilic antioxidants (polyunsaturated fatty acids, carotenoids, vitamin E) would bring salutary effects. To some extent this is borne out in the results discussed below. However the situation is far more complex, with hydrophilic compounds such as sugars also apparently playing significant roles in retinal homeostasis and damage.... The combination of inadequate nutrition with the inability to properly degrade and dispose of cellular debris may contribute to the formation of deposits in the RPE-Bruch’s membrane region.

As might be expected given roles for complement in inflammatory pathways, inflammation is thought to play an important role in AMD pathology...

...Recent appreciation for the nutritional properties of the entire diet, rather than just antioxidants has led to investigations of the roles of macronutrients in AMD pathology...Increased intake of omega-3 fatty acids, especially long-chain omega-3 fatty acids such as docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) found in fish, have been associated with amelioration of a number of chronic diseases... Stronger evidence for a beneficial role of omega-3 fatty acids in eye health is found in two cross-sectional studies....Data from several additional prospective cohorts support a beneficial role of omega-3 fatty acids in reducing risk for any grade of AMD... The effect of fish intake on risk for AMD has been examined because fish is one of the most common dietary sources of omega-3 fatty acids... consumption of at least 2 servings of fish per week was associated with decreased risk for neovascular AMD compared to 0 servings per week.

...In a double-blind, placebo controlled trial of dry AMD patients, it was shown that supplementation with vitamin E, zinc, magnesium, vitamin B6 and folate for 18 months maintained visual acuity, compared to placebo treatment, in which there was a decrease in visual acuity (p = 0.03). The antioxidant supplement group also reported greater vision stability in the areas of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity (p = 0.05) (Richer, 1996). Another double-blind, placebo controlled trial of dry AMD patients found that supplementation with antioxidants and omega-3 fatty acids maintained visual acuity over 6 months, while the placebo group lost visual acuity...

Vitamin C is a powerful anti-inflammatory agent everywhere in the body, and magnesium deficiency may well be involved because it is involved in up to 800 enzymatic processes—and nutrients work in synergy in the body.

What about poisons such as statins, which hugely impact the body’s ability to repair and maintain tissues, by depressing life-giving cholesterol? Note the LACK OF ALL MENTION of statin poisons in the entire full article referenced above.

SARS CoV2 aka COVID-19: Fraudulent Claims on UV LED Disinfecting Lights, Most from China

See all COVID-19 posts.

Dan Llewellyn of writes: (LDP LLC)
See us on Instagram at
See us on Tumblr at

While shopping on Amazon recently, I noticed a number of people selling 'UVC LED Lamps' for disinfecting surfaces. One that caught my eye is advertised as a 100 Watt UVC bulb suitable for sterilizing the home, office, warehouse and supermarket. We have LED flashlights that range from 255nm to 1600nm with over 40 different wavelengths. There is not other shop in the world that carries the frequency range of LED flashlights - over 55 for our XNiteFlashF series. I also know that LED's below 350nm get very expensive and the lower the frequency, the more expensive. We have a 3 Watt 255nm LED light that costs over $600.

BTW, this is also why most of the UV LED's flashlights sold at places like Amazon are misrated. A small 400nm LED might cost $0.05/PC while a 365nm LED might cost $0.50/PC. Almost every UV LED manufactured in China is misrated by 10-20nm. So I figured if the 100 Watt 254nm LED being sold on Amazon, it would be an incredible bargain at $59.95, but I had my suspicions.

We have over 10 different spectrometers covering light from 180nm to 1600nm, and we have a variety of light integration spheres, fiber cables, calibrated light sources, tunable light sources, collimating lenses, cosine correctors, etc, etc.

UV light above 200nm is classified as:

UV-A 315nm-400nm
UV-B 280nm-315nm
UV-C 100nm-280nm

UV-A is the range where you have a blacklight tubes that you see in bars, discos, rave parties, etc. UVA is pretty innocuous. Over long periods of time with enough intensity, you can increase the likelihood of cataracts, but for the most part, you don't need to worry about it.

UV-B is the range where many tanning beds operate. You can get sunburned with UVB. Your body also uses UV-B light to create Vitamin D, so a bit of UVB is actually good for you.

UV-C is the range where the light is germicidal. The light will sterilize things but that is also dependent on the type of thing you are trying to kill, light intensity per unit area, wavelength and time of exposure. UV-C light can give you a cornea burn very quickly but you won't know for a few hours. We have a cheap plastic flashlight with a 4 Watt 254nm bulb that has about 1 Watt of output power. I once looked into it for about 3 seconds and 3 hours later, my eye felt llke I rubbed them with sandpaper. UVC light is no joke, and you need to take precautions when around it.

I measured the Amazon UV LED light, and found that, surprise, surprise, the light is a 395nm LED light. 395nm is not going to be killing anything so save your money on buying a similar bulb.

Below is the spectrometer measured output. Also includes is a trace of an actual 254nm Mercury low pressure germicidal bulb so that you can see the difference. The blue trace is the LED bulb and the red trace is a real germicidal bulb.

Spectral transmission of various UV light sources. Graph courtesy of

Same data below, not as attractive, but gross pattern maybe easier to see.

Spectral transmission of various UV light sources. Graph courtesy of

WIND: China gifted us COVID-19, and now is now defrauding us with products that further put people at risk.

Upgrade the memory of your 2019 iMac up to 128GB

Magnesium Supplementation Personal Findings: Brain, Lungs and Asthma, Sleep, Urinary Flow, Muscle Spasms

Read the books that may save your life; see Your Doctor is NOT Responsible for Your Health—YOU Are! Recommended Reading to Open Your Mind and Ask the Right Questions, Because Your Life Depends On It, in particular, The Magnesium Miracle by Carolyn Dean, MD, ND.

Comments apply to magnesium supplementation was built-up over ~2 weeks to ~1500mg/day using magnesium citrate and magnesium L-Threonate followed by a week of supplementation using ReMag. View all posts on magnesium.

Reflecting on many past health problems, I assert that magnesium deficiency was the likely cause in whole or at least in part. I further state that not one doctor in my life has ever even mentioned magnesium deficiency*.

A few days before writing this, I informed my internist that I had *cured* myself of the need for a prescription stimulant. It drew a blank stare. The attitude and lack of interest was not much different than his response to my asthma/CBD claim where he laughed and said that some patients swore by bear grease. This doctor makes the “top doctors” list in the San Francisco Bay Area, believe it or not. He seems to be a firm believer in the one symptom/one diagnosis/one drug approach to medicine. Nor does he have a clue that Vitamin C greatly diminishes the activity of this particular medicine, a fact found in the literature and personally verified.

A Prescription for Harm: the Modus Operandi of Modern Medicine
Loserthink in Modern Medicine: Goal-Oriented instead of Systems-Oriented

Each medical issue that I detail here has been repeatedly and unequivocally shown by scientific study to be strongly correlated with magnesium deficiency yet not one doctor in 35 years ever has even mentioned magnesium to me*. While correlation is not causation, only a fool does not first address an underlying deficiency prior to doing anything else.

* Not mentioned and not tested-for. If a doctor tests for it, most will use the highly unreliable serum magnesium test instead of the much more reliable magnesium RBC test, which at least correlates strongly with the only good test, the ionized magnesium test.


Since I acquired asthma and allergies from a nasty viral infection at the age of ~21, I have had asthma that for the first 10 years or so after was quite bad. For the past 20 years, it has largely been a “treat as needed” thing with a prescription inhaler, set off by dust or allergies or cold.

Personal experience: magnesium supplementation has calmed my lungs down very effectively so much so that I have given up the prescription inhaler. Instead of the inhaler, I used 400mg magnesium citrate when needed, such as inhaling dust in very windy conditions. I can feel the bronchospasms ease and then go away within 30 minutes. This is at least as effective as the prescription inhaler, with no side effects I have noted.

A week into using ReMag and with the pine pollen in the air heavy (I am highly allergic to it), I have lungs as open and clear in the smallest airways as I have had in three decades—and no prescription inhaler. Magnesium is a known relaxer of small airway tissues. No, the magnesium does not fully block some reaction if I get a strong puff of pollen, but the lungs quickly settle down again—unprecedented in 30 years.

Brain and memory

After a horrible time last year (lingering issues from concussion ), I resorted to a prescription stimulant for ADD and mental fatigue, lest I be financially devastated by an inability to focus or concentrate (months of very poor work are extremely discouraging, to say the least).

Personal experience: a year of that stimulant was critical. It helped with neurogenesis and brain repair, of that I am sure. But about 2 weeks after considerable magnesium supplementation, I now definitely have better brain function (attention span, alertness, concentration, etc). Not only that, I feel no desire for the stimulant (stopped it cold turkey for a week now, as I write this), though it remains to seen if I might still need it occasionally for attentional problems (one of the lingering side effects of my concussion). OTOH maybe the magnesium will completely resolve attention issue. My memory also seems stronger and I am not forgetting things—a known benefit of magnesium. The change is almost startling—I can remind myself of things and remember them later in the day, and that has been a problem for 2+ years since my concussion.

Two days into using ReMag with fairly heavy dosing, I experienced a remarkably alert day all day—focus and alertness without any prescription drug. I would liken it to a double dose of the prescription stimulant I have abandoned.

There is considerable scientific support for magnesium being neuroprotective and neuro-repairative. And yet... none of my doctors never mentioned magnesium before or after my concussion (or ever). Not internists, not ER doctors, not neurologists. Such ignorance rises to medical malpractice, damaging me more and longer than necessary (years). Ditto for the neurologists and my peripheral neuropathy. Willful ignorance is at best a rationalization unworthy of any professional. Shame on all of them.

Muscle spasms

Muscle spasms (sometimes extremely painful) have been an ongoing problem for some years now, so much so that a prescription muscle relaxant was my only recourse. There is considerable science to support the effectiveness of magnesium for muscle relaxation and elimination of muscle spasms.

Personal experience: muscle spasms GONE and muscles more limber and flexible.

Left chest wall pain/tightness

This issue is not cardiac in nature. It has been painful enough to disable me for part of a day with fatigue/pain. I suspect some kind of intercostal muscle spasm but that’s just a guess.

Personal experience: diminishing, have hardly noticed in recent 10 days, no attacks. Vanished completely after one day of ReMag and has not come back over the ensuing week.

Irregular heartbeat

When highly trained in past years, I suffered an irregular heart beat (skipped beat, then extra powerful beat), so annoying that it would keep me from sleeping. I now believe it was caused by magnesium deficiency. To test that theory, I have to attain a comparable level of fitness.


I’ve been suffering sleep quality issues ever since my concussion.

Personal experience: waking up far less often. However, I still seem to have a body clock that is 20 hours or so, throwing me out of sync with the day. So my sleep cycle remains a problem since my concussion. I doubt that magnesium can fix a brain wiring issue, but I won’t rule out some improvement over time.

Frequent urination, difficulty urinating

Getting up to pee 5 to 10 times a night blows. That has been going on for years.

Personal experience: frequency is down to 2 to 3 times per night unless I drink a great deal of fluid or bulky food with a lot of water in it—that situation is to be expected. Flow is greatly improved, steady and without problems. This is already a sea change. It is known that calcium can be deposited in the bladder (and elsewhere) due to inadequate magnesium, and in the bladder it results in the need for frequent urination. Magnesium can steadily pull that calcium back into solution and it can then be excreted.

Coronary artery calcification / atherosclerosis / cholesterol

This one will take longer to assess and requires therapeutic doses of magnesium via ReMag. At the least, I expect to see a halt to my coronary artery calcification — I was tested this year again and saw a troubling substantial year-over-year worsening vs last year. I hope for reversal and will know in one year when I get retested.

Night vision

This has been a problem for me in recent years, and getting worse.

Personal experience: I was able to see adequately last night using the light of only (roughly) half the moon while hiking back on an 18 mile hike.

Blood pressure

Has been generally good but variable from 116/68 to 130/84. I want to see a consistent 116/68 or so. I don’t have my blood pressure monitor along this trip, so this one is a TBD.

Immune system

Only time will tell. But last year’s nasty prostate infection which resulted in horrible malaise from the nasty antibiotics are not something I care to ever repeat. I also think that some of these infections may be the direct result of magnesium deficiency weakening the immune system along with calcification in body tissues.

Pseudo-KETO: Three Months on a Low Carbohydrate and Low Sugar Diet

Some say that “sugar is more addictive than heroin” .

I cannot attest to that claim, since I have never use heroin and never will. But I can say that breaking the sugar habit can be very difficult, particularly the first week, and especially with intense exercise involved.

I’ve been on the road for 3+ months in my Sprinter van, doing my usual photography field work. During that time I eliminated all added sugar with few exceptions. I also cut my carbohydrate intake way down.

On the whole, I can say that eliminating sugar and most carbs has worked out very well. But I cannot attribute any health gains to it, and recovery and performance are impaired without some carbs.

Exception, candy bar frenzy, early March: after a double century where I did not eat much after finishing, the next day I bought ten (10) candy bars and promptly ate eight (8) of them in two hours (Payday and Milky Way)—about 2400 calories. No ill effects and I finished off the other two the next morning for a total of 3000 calories. The drive to eat those bars was powerful and I yielded to it, though that was supposed to have been a ten day supply. My suspicion is that it is far better to binge-eat than to drag it out, hence my historical habits with See’s Candy (chocolates).

Carbs ===> Fats

The only way to cut back carbs successfully is to greatly increase the intake of fat. For that purpose, I use nuts, avocados, olive oil, coconut oil, MCTs from coconut oil, wild salmon, eggs, grass-fed ghee, whole fat yogurt from high-grade milk preferably grass-fed (Strauss Greek Whole Milk is superb) and animal fat from grass-fed meat*. All organic. I do not eat factory food.

For me it takes 7-10 days for the candy/sugar craving to go away. After that, the craving is reduced to a ghost of its former self, but this trip I found that it was not completely gone even after a month. I have concluded that intense exercise reawakens candy/sugar craving on a short-term basis, so the key is to eat nutrient dense foods that have low but significant carbohydrates in them—e.g., whole milk yogurt, fresh fruit and veggies, etc.

Sugar equivalent while riding

Tailwind Nutrition sports drink endurance fuel

The key with moderately high intensity endurance exercise is to maintain both blood glucose levels and electrolyte levels. For that, I use Tailwind. Any left-over I use post-workout, as the muscles need some carbohydrates (along with protein) for recovery.

I find it difficult to exceed about 2.5 hours of riding without some energy input. Plus I will have lost at least 2L of fluid, and as much as 6L if intensity is high in high heat. Thus it is critical to hydrate, and water sucks since it absorbs much more slowly than a proper sports drink. For that, I swear by Tailwind, which contains both electrolytes and dextrose (turns directly into blood glucose). BTW, do NOT use products like Gatorade for endurance exercise (lacks key electrolytes and contains sucrose or fructose which burden the liver and forestall immediate availability).

High exercise levels not compatible with pure Keto

The biggest problem I have faced in cutting back on carbohydrates (“carbs”) is that under a training load averaging 1600 KCal per day, my body cannot restore its glycogen stores in 24 hours. Too little carbohydrate leads to impaired recovery and impaired energy levels. So far, my body just cannot do enough gluconeogenesis in 24 hours to restore muscle and liver stores of glycogen to full levels. So the “tank” is not full the next day and over a few days, performance drops quickly.

I just do not believe the Keto folks who make their near-zero carb claims—let them eat fat and see if another 55 year old can keep up with my workouts, and then we’ll talk. Keto in a serious athletic context sounds like an out of balance dogma. As to “office-chair Keto”—sure, why not since glycogen demands are modest.

While I have a very highly trained aerobic system capable of burning fat for daylong events, the aerobic system is insufficient when energy demands increase beyond aerobic inputs. That means using glycogen for a substantial part of energy production. At age 55 my power output is down 15% or so versus age 46, but even so we are talking about 250 watts or so on a 8% grade (when well rested).

By around 8000' elevation, my lungs are heaving and totally maxed-out to maintain ~250 watts—there is not enough oxygen to produce the required power any more—total power drops regardless and lots of glycogen starts being utilized. The anaerobic energy demands rapidly depletes glycogen stores. This is true even on the flats—the body will always “burn” some glycogen. Plus the visual system of the brain has very high demands for glycogen to cope with image analysis on a bicycle—just try having a concussion and you’ll figure that out quickly.

Over the past 3 months, I have experienced intense cravings for anything sweet. These cravings slowly fall off to a low level after a week, but the first week it is very hard to resist buying something high in sugar like a candy bar or licorice—mind you my sugar consumption has been very moderate for years compared to most of the population.

* I am not worried about the discredited ever-changing and never-proven cholesterol hypothesis quackery vs atherosclerosis—anti-scientific piffle. Atherosclerosis is surely the result of oxidized LDL stemming from inflammatory processes along with magnesium deficiency.

Up to 1527MB/s sustained performance

Just Say 'Yes' to Powerful Drugs: The Great Majority of Medical Doctors Wallow in Nutritional Ignorance

View all posts on magnesium.

Recent experiences with magnesium follow below.

Learning must be lifelong in any field, but particularly when health is concerned and it’s your job to maximize health.

Shame on MDs who ignore nutritional deficiencies or proven treatments just because medical textbooks did not include them in the edition in force during training.

I don’t fault any MD who was unaware and untrained in nutrition who then becomes aware and takes action to fix the knowledge deficiency. Sadly, none of my doctors have ever engaged their brains on nutrition! On the flip side, no one should ever be faulted for doing the right thing “too late”, since just about any right thing could have been done sooner.

So—kudos to MDs willing and eager to grow their knowledge and to change their practice accordingly. Kudos to MDs who thrive on the knowledge that patients can teach them a thing or two, if only they choose to listen and observe—versus paint-by-numbers medicine. Kudos to MDs who come to the realization that much of what they learned in medical school has been debunked and that much was left out.

Kudos to MDs who realize that conclusions in medical studies are often unwarranted unsupportable bunk based on ill-conceived testing protocols, with conclusions often influenced by cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias. For those reasons, reading conclusions in medical studies is intellectually indefensible—at least some skimming/scanning must be done to see whether the conclusions may be misleading, or even indefensible.

Practicing medicine without an intellectual basis for it

See: A Prescription for Harm: the Modus Operandi of Modern Medicine

No organism can enjoy health when deprived of critical nutrients, yet this is precisely how modern medicine operates. I speak especially of magnesium deficiency, but also of Vitamin D3 and Vitamin K. But also the healing powers of Vitamin C against toxins/poisons and against viruses and bacteria and their toxins—efficacy willfully ignored and “debunked” by studies intentionally ignoring the protocols of per F.R. Klenner and then falsely claiming lack of efficacy.

Some readers might think my prior posts on health have been much too critical of doctors. But the more I learn and prove to myself the reality that I myself was ill served by modern medicine, I am now thinking I was too kind.

It is not the past which I am condemning, but the failure to take immediate and intensive effort to fix the intellectual deficit. The right thing done “too late” is still worthy of praise.

So I am now doubling down: I assert that most doctors are grossly ignorant of nutrition and therefore incompetent because they fail to consider nutrient deficiency. Willful ignorance in the face of tens of thousands of studies rises to medical malpractice, which is not infrequently based on financial conflicts of interest.

Shame on every doctor who fails to consider*, for example, magnesium for hypertension, blood sugar, migraines, neuropathy, neurological protection and repair, coronary artery calcification, and dozens of other conditions before resorting to dangerous drugs. Yes, all those things can result from magnesium deficiency and it is only one of many nutrients. Not one of my doctors ever even mentioned magnesium in my lifetime.

Not trained in nutrition and apparently uninterested in the health robustness that comes from proper nutrition, doctors as a group wallow in their ignorance and have become dispensers of poisons of many types (eg statins), with unjustified cognitive commitments and confirmation biases instilled in medical schools where “knowledge” is regularly debunked and studies are conflicting and barely plausible due to statistical manipulation to suit funding sponsors, and shot through with financial and ethical conflicts—then taken as the basis for one-size-fits-all guidelines which often are little better than quackery

Doctors now apply epidemiological pseuedo-science to individuals in so many areas even while ignoring critical nutritional requirements: “here are your drugs, you will never be cured, take them the rest of your life along with the additional drugs that will be needed due to damaging the body with the starting drug and failing to make any attempt at health”. It is a huge reeking manure pile of intellectual and ethical malfeasance.

Were I a doctor, I don’t know how I could look myself in the mirror until I thoroughly expanded my knowledge of nutrition, since everything in health rests upon it. If only 10% of my patients could be helped and perhaps cured by nutritional means, wouldn’t I have the strongest ethical obligation to do so? Medical ethics seem to be an oxymoron. A

It is a sad state of affairs for anyone with a health problem.

For a global health crisis caused by the disturbing mentality of the modern medical establishment, see BMJ: “Subclinical magnesium deficiency: a principal driver of cardiovascular disease and a public health crisis”.

Upgrade the memory of your 2019 iMac up to 128GB

Vitamin C: Best Most Bioavailable Form?

See all COVID-19 posts.

Maybe high-dose Vitamin C can beat COVID-19 and other viruses as suggested by the work of F.R Klenner, and maybe not. That is pure speculation on my part. Most doctors will scoff, so take that at face value—but you can bet that very few have even thought about it, or have any clue as to the research.

If intravenous Vitamin C is not available (outpatient setting at health care facility), I’d bet on true lipospheric Vitamin C in properly administered dosing over any official treatment for COVID-19, none of which work in a meaningful way.

NOTE: lipospheric is NOT “liposomal”, see below.

At the least, Vitamin C detoxifies numerous substances, so in that regard, it is a no-brainer when infected, because viruses and bacteries release various toxins into the body, and other toxins can accumulate when the body is weakened.

Best and highest bioavailable Vitamin C

Lypo-Spheric Vitamin C

My research is not yet done, and there may be more than one top-flight brand, but apparently not very many. Two brands that look like the real deal for true Lypo–Spheric Vitamin C, are:

Don’t be confused by “liposomal Vitamin C”, which can be little more than a mix of Vitamin C and lipids—not encapsulated spheres. It will be cheaper, but it is not the same thing! Which is not to say it is bad or ineffective, just that its bioavailability may be notably less and it might behave inconsistently across individuals. It’s not clear that any price premium for liposomal vs regualar Vitamin C is worth it.

Bottom line is that if you want to the best and most predictable bioavailability, true Lypo-Spheric Vitamin C is the way to go. By virtue of very high bioavailability, something far more meaningful can be said as to whether Vitamin C treatment worked or not versus the variable bioavailability of other products in different bodies.

Alpha lipoic acid is also an anti-oxidant: see alpha lipoic acid in LypriCel Liposomal R-Alpha and Aurora Nutrascience, Mega-Liposomal R-Alpha Lipoic Acid.

Best regular Vitamin C

There are many good brands out there.

  • Keep in mind that conventional Vitamin C is only about 20% bioavailable.
  • With conventional Vitamin C, your body will excrete (pee out) most of it.
  • At higher doses, some brands may give you a massive upset stomach and/or diarrhea (I took 9000mg once of one brand for an impending viral infection, and it bloated me up like 3-day-old roadkill—one of the most unpleasant days of my life and quite painful.

Result can vary! I’ve had good luck with:

OWC Mercury Elite Pro Dock

Up to 32TB Capacity!

Dual-drive solution from 4TB to 32TB, hardware RAID, USB ports, DisplayPort, gigabit ethernet, SD card reader.

Huge capacity in travel-friendly form-factor.

Vitamin C: Detoxifies Acetaldehyde (breakdown product of alcohol)

Best Vitamin C?

Toxins are best avoided.

And... alcohol is a toxin, well acetaldehyde is, and Vitamin C detoxifies that acetaldehyde.

So in the interest of science, I guess I have no choice in the matter: testing how pre-dosing with Vitamin C works vs a suitable acoholic agent.

It might take a lot of testing to do it right (e.g., number of shots vs how much C).

But science can be hard and someone has to do the dirty work. I ran one preliminary test with champagne, and as far as I could tell when I woke up, it went really well with 2000mg Vitamin C pre-dosing. I think.

Of course, the counfounding influences of how many limes and whether sea salt amount matters all mean that this might have to be a long-term trial to establish correlations (causation is such a bother with serious medical studies).

Sorry, so far this is a very small study and no additional participants can be accommodated at this time, not unless a fully independent sponsor like Don Julio gets on board*, which would allow a much larger cohort.

* Were it to be a fully medically defensible half-blnd study, then an uninterested party like the Mexican Tequila Consortium would provide the test agent (including morning doses), as well as collecting, analyzing data and drawing scientifically robust conlusions—just like statin trials. All data would of course remain confidential (just like many statin trials), just in case study participants were to become belligerant. Due to the nature if the study, it would not be ethical to discontinue the trial until scientific certainty had been reached (the reverse of statin trials, which should be stopped quickly if trend lines show any sign of disagreeing with the obvious outcome).

Test agent for detoxifying effects of Vitamin C


Upgrade the memory of your 2019 iMac up to 128GB

Vitamin C: a cure for lethal viral infections including Poliomyelitis, and could it cure COVID-19? The Groundbreaking Work of Doctor F.R. Klenner and How It was Ignored

See all COVID-19 posts.

Best Vitamin C?

To be clear, there is NO EVIDENCE I am aware of that Vitamin C can cure COVID-19 (other than the F.R. Klenner work cited below, which in proper dosing is claimed to kill many viruses).

And I don’t expect any to emerge, since no drug company wants to waste money on trialing a product that cannot be patented, no matter how effective it might be. After all, if obvious fraud shut down nearly all trials of hydroxychloroquine, what the hell can we expect from our gullible “experts” some of WHOm still insist that masks are not needed unless caring for a COVID-19 patient?

Most doctors are complicit in that mentality for all diseases, an ugly truth of modern medicine. Doctors are now employed directly by hospitals and soon drug companies will own the hospitals, a nauseating prospect for health and well being.

And yet since there is no effective treatment known as I write this, my personal approach would be to take as much Vitamin C as my gut could tolerate (preferably liposomal Vitamin C) because at the least it has been well proven to neutralize toxins.


The jury is definitely out as far as mainstream allopathic medicine goes, but there are hints that the way Vitamin C has been treated is another “statin fiasco”, but in the opposite sense.

While statins are poisons inflicted on the public based on a never-proven constantly-changing cholesterol hypothesis drive by money, status and patent profits. Whereas Vitamin C is essential to life and was proven to cure “untreatable” viral infections with no toxicity even at extremely high doses (too much water can kill you, so is water toxic?).

The fiasco part? So far, what I am seeing is that studies that actually test the Dr F.R. Klenner protocols seem to have been studiously avoided by the modern medical establishment, with the wrong protocols used to “prove” that Vitamin C doesn’t work. And if it’s not mentioned in medical texts, it doesn’t exist as far as modern medicine is concerned (99% of doctors).

The published findings of F.R. Klenner are fascinating, and none other than Nobel Laureate Linus Pauling was a staunch Vitamin C proponent.

Hidden In Plain Sight: The Pioneering Work of Frederick Robert Klenner, M.D

Some physicians would stand by and see their patient die rather than use ascorbic acid because in their finite minds it exists only as a vitamin. –F. R. Klenner, MD

It has been reported that one of the mold-derived drugs, in addition to being a good antibiotic, is a super-vitamin. Conversely, we argue that Vitamin C, besides being an essential vitamin, is a super- antibiotic. Vitamin C in vitro, if maintained at body temperature, inactivates certain toxins at an unbelievable rate.

The Treatment of Poliomyelitis and Other Virus Diseases with Vitamin C, by Fred R. Klenner, M.D.

IN A PREVIOUS REPORT dealing with the antagonistic properties of ascorbic acid to the virus of atypical pneumonia, mention was made of the fact that other types of virus infections had responded favorably to vitamin C. This paper is to present these findings as well as the results of subsequent studies on the virus of poliomyelitis, the viruses causing measles, mumps, chickenpox, herpes zoster, herpes simplex and influenza. Further studies with the virus of atypical pneumonia will also be discussed.

These observations of the action of ascorbic acid on virus diseases were made independently of any knowledge of previous studies using vitamin C on virus pathology, except for the negative report of Sabin after treating Rhesus monkeys experimentally infected with the poliomyelitis virus. A review of the literature in preparation of this paper, however, presented an almost unbelievable record of such studies. The years of labor in animal experimentations; the cost in human effort and in “grants,” and the volumes written, make it difficult to understand how so many investigators could have failed in comprehending the one thing that would have given positive results a decade ago. This one thing was the size of the dose of vitamin C employed and the frequency of its administration. In all fairness it must be said that Jungeblut noted on several occasions that he attributed his failure of results to the possibility that the strength of his injectable “C” was inadequate. It was he who unequivocally said that “vitamin C can truthfully be designated as the antitoxic and antiviral vitamin.”

In the poliomyelitis epidemic in North Carolina in 1948, 60 cases of this disease came under our care. These patients presented all or almost all of these signs and symptoms: Fever of 101 to 104.6°, headache, pain at the back of the eyes, conjunctivitis, scarlet throat; pain between the shoulders, the back of the neck, one or more extremity, the lumbar back; nausea, vomiting and constipation. In 15 of these cases the diagnosis was confirmed by lumbar puncture; the cell count ranging from 33 to 125...

The treatment employed was vitamin C in massive doses. It was given like any other antibiotic every two to four hours. The initial dose was 1000 to 2000 mg., depending on age...

Two patients in this series of 60 regurgitated fluid through the nose. This was interpreted as representing the dangerous bulbar type. For a patient in this category postural drainage, oxygen administration, in some cases tracheotomy, needs to be instituted, until the vitamin C has had sufficient time to work — in our experience 36 hours. Failure to recognize this factor might sacrifice the chance of recovery. With these precautions taken, every patient [WIND: 60 patients] of this series recovered uneventfully within three to five days.

...Chickenpox gave equally good response...

...Many cases of influenza were treated with vitamin C...

...The response of virus encephalitis to ascorbic acid therapy was dramatic. Six cases of virus encephalitis were treated and cured with vitamin C injections...

...The use of vitamin C in measles proved to be a medical curiosity...It was our privilege to observe this picture over and over in two little volunteer girls for 30 days. These “research helpers” were my own little daughters. The measles virus was eventually destroyed in this instance by continuing 12,000 mg. by mouth each 24 hours for four days. We interpreted this result to indicate that on withdrawing the drug with the cessation of signs and symptoms, a small quantity of the virus remained, which after another incubation period produced anew the first stage of measles; when the drug was continued beyond the clearing stage the virus was destroyed in toto. No case of post-measles bronchopneumonia was seen...

...Of mumps, 33 cases were treated with ascorbic acid. When vitamin C was given at the peak of the infection the fever was gone within 24 hours, the pain within 36 hours, the swelling in 48 to 72 hours...

...Further studies on virus pneumonia showed that the clinical response was better when vitamin C was given to these patients according to the dose schedule outlined for poliomyelitis...


In using vitamin C as an antibiotic no factor of toxicity need be considered. To confirm this observation 200 consecutive hospital patients were given ascorbic acid, 500 to 1000 mg. every four to six hours, for five to ten days. One volunteer received 100,000 mg. in a 12-day period. It must be remembered that 90 per cent of these patients did not have a virus infection to assist in destroying the vitamin. In no instance did examination of the blood or urine indicate any toxic reaction, and at no time were there any clinical manifestations of a reaction to the drug. When vitamin C was given by mouth one per cent of these patients vomited shortly after taking the drug. In half of these cases the vomiting was controlled by increasing the carbohydrate content of the mixture. This reaction was not interpreted as representing a toxic manifestation; rather it was thought to be due to a hypersensitive gastric mucosa. The dose was reduced from 1000 to 100 mg. in young children showing this complex; vomiting occurred as before. However, in these same patients administration of massive, frequent doses of vitamin C by needle effected a cure of the infection without causing vomiting.

From a review of the literature one can safely state that in all instances of experimental work with ascorbic acid on the virus organism the amount of virus used was beyond the range of the administered dose of this vitamin. No one would expect to relieve kidney colic with a five-grain aspirin tablet; by the same logic we cannot hope to destroy the virus organism with doses of vitamin C of 10 to 400 mg. The results which we have reported in virus diseases using vitamin C as the antibiotic may seem fantastic. These results, however, are no different from the results we see when administering the sulfa, or the mold-derived drugs against many other kinds of infections. In these latter instances we expect and usually get 48- to 72-hour cures; it is laying no claim to miracle-working then, when we say that many virus infections can be cleared within a similar time limit.

Incredible. But Vitamin C cannot be patented, so the modern medical establishment steadfastly seems to have ignored the protocols and “proved” these results wrong.

The Origin of the 42-Year Stonewall of Vitamin C, by Robert Landwehr

In the late spring of 1949 the United States was in the grip of its worst poliomyelitis epidemic ever. On June 10 a paper on ways to save the lives of bulbar polio victims was read at the Annual Session of the American Medical Association (subsequently printed in its journal, JAMA, September 3, 1949, pages 1-8, volume 141, no. 1). Following the talk members of the audience were invited to comment. The first speaker, a leading authority from Pasadena, focused on details of tracheotomy techniques caused when paralyzed breathing, swallowing and coughing muscles of victims threatened their lives. Why the next person was recognized is puzzling. The only national recognition he had received — and it was obviously very limited — was that his picture appeared in Ebony in 1947 for having delivered of a deaf-mute black woman the first known surviving, identical quadruplets in the country. Here is the abstract of his remarks as recorded in JAMA.

Dr. F. R. Klenner, Reidsville, N.C.: It might be interesting to learn how polio- myelitis was treated in Reidsville, N.C., during the 1948 epidemic. In the past seven years, virus infections have been treated and cured in a period of seventy-two hours by the employment of massive frequent injections of ascorbic acid, or vitamin C. I believe that if vitamin C in these massive doses — 6,000 to 20,000 mg in a twenty- four hour period — is given to these patients with poliomyelitis none will be paralyzed and there will be no further maiming or epidemics of poliomyelitis."

...One can imagine the silence that must have greeted this sweeping, out-of-place declaration by a small-town general practitioner.

The empirical, clinical basis for Klenner's statement is found in his paper "The Treatment of Poliomyelitis and Other Virus Diseases with Vitamin C", published in the July 1949 issue of the Journal of Southern Medicine and Surgery. On pages 211-212 he writes:

THE JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN MEDICINE AND SURGERY: Massive Doses of Vitamin C and the Virus Diseases, F. R. KLENNER, M.D

It has been reported that one of the mold-derived drugs, in addition to being a good antibiotic, is a super-vitamin. Conversely, we argue that Vitamin C, besides being an essential vitamin, is a super- antibiotic. Vitamin C in vitro, if maintained at body temperature, inactivates certain toxins at an unbelievable rate.

...It is therefore reasonable to conclude that the degree of neutralization in a virus infection will be in proportion to the concentration of the vitamin and the length of time in which it is employed.

...Vitamin C, likewise, is important, not only as a detoxifying agent, as a catalyst aiding cellular respiration by acting as a hydrogen transport, as a catalyst in the assimilation of iron, and as a conservator of collagen fibers and bundles in tissues of mesenchymal origin; but, also, because of its function as a reducing agent or the precursor of such a substance. In this latter capacity it fulfills the requirements of an antibiotic. A striking phenomenon of vitamin C is the similarity of response, whether to correct pathologic processes due to a deficiency of this compound, acting as a vitamin; or to destroy the ferments of microorganisms, acting as an antibiotic.

A few key points of Dr. Klenners work on Vitamin C include (1) many viruses and bacteria kill by toxins and Vitamin C neutralizes those toxin, (2) some viral effects are in effect “focal” (localized) scurvy which can lead to severe problems from bleeding, (3) Vitamin C interferes with viral replication but enough must be used and long enough to overwhelm the virus very much a therapeutic threshold response, which varies by the viral and toxic load.

OWC Easy SSD Upgrade Guide
MacBook Pro and MacBook Air
iMac, Mac Pro, MacMini, more! | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
Mailing Lists | RSS Feeds | Twitter
Copyright © 2020 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.
Display info: __RETINA_INFO_STATUS__