Real science is never settled, and anyone who has certainty on such things is not qualified to discuss it.
In this case, if Pfizer funded the study, and if the results still suck for children, what does that tell you? Probably that there is not only minimal benefit, but all the nasty problems that occur and will occur are not even dealt with.
2023-09-21. Emphasis added.
A new study funded by Pfizer found the company's COVID-19 vaccine did not perform well in children under 5.
Children aged 6 months to 4 years are supposed to receive three shots of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The number was increased from two when early testing showed little effectiveness.
WIND: in other words, the “vaccine” did not perform, so they tried to enlarge the cohort to get some result that could hide the idiocy of the whole thing, for a problem that does not exist—children were not and are not at risk from COVID, rare (really rare) exceptions aside.
Those who would “vaccinate” children against COVID, which poses no threat whatsoever to them, are child abusers, aided and abetted by the most ethically dubious doctors in the past century. Three doses into a young immune-naive body is outrageous.