Real science is never settled, and anyone who has certainty on such things is not qualified to discuss it.
It’s just a little extra DNA and who knows what else. What could go wrong?
My last doctor’s visit, the first and rather insistent question my doctor (internal medicine) asked me was whether I had gotten a COVID shot (no, never). Because a LOT of his patients are seeing auto-immune problems. Gee, must be total coincidence. These goofy conventional doctors will see a pattern over and over and actually think it means something. They should stick to the talking points the FDA gives them rather than trying to think about things too big for them.
2023-10-31. Emphasis added.
Dr. Robert Malone and other experts say the COVID-19 shot should be recalled.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is refusing to recall the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, promoting the view that the inclusion of a previously-undisclosed DNA sequence that leaves behind fragments is not of concern.
...“With over a billion doses of the mRNA vaccines administered, no safety concerns related to the sequence of, or amount of, residual DNA have been identified. With regard to the FDA-approved mRNA vaccines, available scientific evidence supports the conclusion that they are safe and effective," the spokeswoman added.
...The Epoch Times has submitted a Freedom of Information Act query to try to unlock when the FDA learned about the sequence, and from whom. The FDA denied expedited processing for the request, claiming there is not a "compelling need" to quickly provide the information.
Several foreign agencies, including Health Canada, have confirmed outside scientists' assessment that the vaccine contains the DNA sequence. They've also said BioNTech did not highlight the inclusion in regulatory filings.
The FDA would not answer a number of questions about the sequence, including when the agency learned about its inclusion and whether it learned about it from Pfizer or BioNTech.
...A number of scientists have said the inclusion raises major concerns, such as having potential for oncogenesis—or a process that leads to cancer—including Dr. Robert Malone, a vaccine expert whose work has been cited by Pfizer.
The inclusion means the Pfizer-BioNTech shot is "adulterated" and should be recalled, Dr. Malone told The Epoch Times.
..."The general policy is that if there's adulteration and reasonable risk of toxicity, there must be immediate action," Dr. Malone told The Epoch Times. "This is a core mandate to the FDA from Congress to prevent adulteration of drugs, medical devices, and food....
...Moderna has said that its vaccine meets the FDA's gene therapy definition, but regulators have defined the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna products as vaccines, avoiding questions about oncogenesis.
David Wiseman, a former Johnson & Johnson scientist who conducted some of the testing, said that he's concerned the residual DNA pieces "could actually get into your genome."
WIND: you cannot find what you don’t look for.
What do you expect from an agency that is wholly captured by Big Pharma?
Besides, what would people think if they knew there were a risk of something untoward? And heck, a little mercury or antifreeze in vaccines has long been accepted. What’s the big deal?
abused vaccinated their children for COVID shouldn’t sweat such details. Trust your health care provider. They would never mislead you, since they are always using the best available scientific truths.