SEARCH
The Propaganda and Pysyops Campaigns for COVID Vaccine Profits Re-Launch
Related: health, SARS-CoV-2 aka COVID-19 aka Coronavirus, scientific fraud, The Brownstone Institute, The Epoch Times, vaccination, weather events
re: The Epoch Times
re: Brownstone Institute
re: COVID
re: medical battery and child abuse and ethics in medicine
re: A Few Doctors So Cocksure about COVID Jab that Medical Battery on Children is Rationalized
Real science is never settled, and anyone who has certainty on such things is not qualified to discuss it.
re: Pharma Industry not only Controls the FDA, but the Presidency?
The next $100B of Big Pharma profits are on the line. An all-out campaign first to frighten and then harass the populace into compliance with an never-properly-tested gene therapy jab is in full swing. The mRNA technology is already being used in other “vaccines” along with a load of toxins that should never go into a human body.
Buy Pfizer stock?
Brownstone Institute: Get a New Covid Shot? The Evidence Suggests Otherwise
2023-09-08. Emphasis added.
Fall is coming and the Covid propaganda machine, fueled by manufacturers of Covid vaccines, is already here. Without a single trial of the effectiveness against death, lipid nanoparticles that contain mRNA and perhaps more (remnant DNA?) will likely be added to regular flu vaccination every winter. Perhaps as soon as this winter they will no longer be called booster doses.
...Taking a new Covid shot every winter, whether called booster or not, has no empirical basis. The burden of proving effectiveness against death squarely rests on public health officials, and anything short of a randomized trial is unacceptable.
...
The healthy vaccinee biasA naïve comparison of Covid mortality in vaccinated people and unvaccinated people, even if age-adjusted, is grossly misleading because the former have a lower risk of death to begin with. At least part of their lower Covid mortality, if not all, has nothing to do with the vaccine. They are simply healthier people than their unvaccinated counterparts. That’s called the healthy vaccinee bias.
...Corrected estimates of effectiveness are shown in the graph below. Comparing the second graph to the first, it is apparent that the magnitude of the healthy vaccinee bias was large, and in April 2022, biased estimates of 54 percent to 70 percent were essentially nullified. We also observe rapid and complete waning of effectiveness, which was not seen in the biased results.
...
WIND: we still do not have credible randomized trials of the COVID gene-abuse Jabs. Nor do I see any credible scientific evidence that the COVID jabs have done more good than harm, speaking in net population terms (I would expect some net benefit from very high risk cohorts).
Was the COVID Jab a Colossal Failure or a Huge Success?
No vaccine should be considered safe until and unless it has been properly tested. But nothing close has been done for The Jab, the control groups were sdestroyed, and data has been hidden/buried on safety. Second, at least 10 years of safety and efficacy must be established. We’re 2+ years into The Jab rollout. The pharma industry has a long and sordid and evil record of hurting people for profit, as numerous court settlements show, but no one ever goes to jail for it.
None of those ethical requirements have been remotely approached.
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Reduce Immune Response to Other Infections, Potential Concern of Immune Deficiency
2023-09-06. Emphasis added.
A recent study on the immune effects of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccine has scientists raising concerns over vaccine-acquired immune deficiencies.
Vaccine-acquired immune deficiency syndrome (VAIDS) is a new colloquial term coined by researchers and health practitioners since the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. Though not recognized as a medical condition, some experts believe the COVID-19 vaccines may impair or suppress immune responses.
...“Our findings suggest SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination could alter the immune response to other pathogens, which cause both vaccine-preventable and non-vaccine-preventable diseases,” the authors of the paper published in Frontiers in Immunology wrote.
“This is particularly relevant in children as they: have extensive exposure to microbes at daycare, school, and social occasions; are often encountering these microbes for the first time; and receive multiple vaccines as part of routine childhood vaccination schedules.”
...
WIND: a very small study and hence not very credible—could be totally wrong. However, how do you fund a proper study of this question when wholly captive government agencies want nothing to do with it?
BTW, vaccines have NEVER been tested in combination, yet medical doctors routinely give many vaccines at once, which raises very serous issues of informed consent, a violation of medical ethics. So much for “science”. As I wrote:
I still vividly remember my bubbly/happy newborn daughter crying and in pain from being jabbed right after birth with 3 or 4 shots, a callously inappropriate disruption of a joyous moment. But hey, the nurse has a schedule. That I remember it so vividly should be evidence enough of its situational inappropriateness. And I now consider it medical battery because there was no informed consent, meaning a form to sign passed off as a formality is not informing. A routine for the convenience of arrogant cocksure doctors with no skin in the game. Making a beautiful new body a repository for whatever toxins the vaccine contains, all dumped in one fell swoop. Maybe that’s why she developed auto-immune at 14, and maybe not... no one can say. But in hindsight, the cocksure presumptuousness of it all is unsettling.
