Real science is never settled, and anyone who has certainty on such things is not qualified to discuss it.
Well, at least the WHO has its head partially out of its ass. Looks like the wheels of sanity are slowly turning the titanic away from the iceberg.
Yet another leading health institution has unveiled a significant Covid policy reversal this week... this time it's none other than the World Health Organization (WHO) saying something that might have gotten an individual suspended from social media or publicly "canceled" a mere one or two years ago:
...The revision in guidelines was put out this week by the WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) - a group of scientists and officials which said they no longer recommend the Covid vaccine for "healthy" children ages 6 months to 17 years.
"The public health impact of vaccinating healthy children and adolescents is comparatively much lower than the established benefits of traditional essential vaccines for children – such as the rotavirus, measles, and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines," SAGE wrote.
The new policy identifies three priority groups — high, medium and low — and puts children and teens in the low category. The definitions assess categories for "risk of severe disease and death". The WHO still recommends that "Children who have compromised immune systems or existing health conditions should still get the vaccine."
WIND: they’re steering back to a course that we should have been navigating all along.
...The revised roadmap outlines three priority-use groups for COVID-19 vaccination: high, medium, and low. These priority groups are principally based on risk of severe disease and death, and consider vaccine performance, cost-effectiveness, programmatic factors and community acceptance....
WIND: whatever, still piss poor on the science reasoning. But it’s progress.